Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Twin Carb Vacuum Signal?


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#16 nicklouse

nicklouse

    Moved Into The Garage

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,588 posts
  • Location: Not Yorkshire
  • Local Club: Anonyme Miniholiker

Posted 19 March 2015 - 09:29 PM

I can vouch for des hammil, he has an excellent book about webers too by the way.
So I know vacuum is more of a signal and not an airflow, but connecting 2 carbs, would that make the signal twice as strong?
Or would there be a difference in strenght between ( for example) a HS4 and a hs6 carb? Or are the vaccum takeoff holes in the carb adjusted to be equal?


The pump is the same. Makes none or little difference

#17 Dan

Dan

    On Sabbatical

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,354 posts

Posted 19 March 2015 - 09:31 PM

I can vouch for des hammil, he has an excellent book about webers too by the way.
So I know vacuum is more of a signal and not an airflow, but connecting 2 carbs, would that make the signal twice as strong?
Or would there be a difference in strenght between ( for example) a HS4 and a hs6 carb? Or are the vaccum takeoff holes in the carb adjusted to be equal?


Think about what's causing the effect. The size of the diaphragm in the vacuum unit is what's doing the work really.

#18 Mini Manannán

Mini Manannán

    Well I'll be buggered if I can find it

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,857 posts
  • Location: Middle of the Irish Sea
  • Local Club: man Estate

Posted 20 March 2015 - 08:20 AM

The dizzy should read throttle edge depression. As above Rover did try to use full manifold depression on various Metros and it caused a hunting, pulsing idle. There was a name for the effect but I can't remember what it was.

 

Dan/KC, would my 64DM4 be better off with the vac advance before the throttle disc or after as it now then?  It sounds like I need to drill a new hole.



#19 KernowCooper

KernowCooper

    Sparkie

  • Mini Docs
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • Name: Dave
  • Location: The South West
  • Local Club: Kernow Mini Club

Posted 20 March 2015 - 09:55 PM

A standard 65D4M should read vacuum behind the throttle plate in the carburettor, do you not have one there? what Carb do you have?



#20 Mini Manannán

Mini Manannán

    Well I'll be buggered if I can find it

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,857 posts
  • Location: Middle of the Irish Sea
  • Local Club: man Estate

Posted 21 March 2015 - 07:27 AM



A standard 65D4M should read vacuum behind the throttle plate in the carburettor, do you not have one there? what Carb do you have?

 

It's a HIF44, here's a pic I took last week when we were trying to figure out the weird idle: 

 

IMG_20150313_155158_zpsb56cg7ec.jpg

 

I think I might have inherited a mongrel :-)



#21 KernowCooper

KernowCooper

    Sparkie

  • Mini Docs
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,847 posts
  • Name: Dave
  • Location: The South West
  • Local Club: Kernow Mini Club

Posted 21 March 2015 - 07:02 PM

or a carb of the MG Metro with engine vacuum advance take off

 

Keith Calver wrote this

 

On some HIF carbs, the vac take-off located just after the butterfly - that's between the butterfly and the carb to manifold mounting flange - has been eliminated.

Instead, the engines these carbs are fitted to use a vac take off in the manifold. The reason for this is again wholly idle emissions orientated. The higher vacuum that exists in the manifold area can be used to pull more ignition advance. Theoretically this will reduce emissions at idle. Unfortunately it's exposed to induction pulsing. In the A-series, this is UGLY. The pulsing and high manifold vacuum causes rough idling. Particularly where anything 'sportier' (ANYTHING) than a bog-stock-standard cam profile is used.

Classic example - the MG Metro. Its adventurously sporty cam makes for a slightly lumpy idle. This increases idle speed emissions, so Rover use manifold-sourced vacuum to increase idle speed ignition timing via the vac advance. We're talking 28 degrees of ignition timing here! Doesn't work because the pulsing created by the cam causes erratic ignition timing, culminating in running on. So an anti-run-on valve was fitted as a modification. Vicious circle. After messing about trying to solve the emission problems this caused, it was found that changing the originally quoted valve clearances to 0.014"inlet /0.017" exhaust (effectively reducing the cam over-lap) helped dramatically. And, like I said earlier, the sportier the profile, the worse it becomes. Even worse - when running, this system can cause ignition advances in the order of 50 degrees on lift-off and on again - an absolute sure-fire recipe for savage detonation.

 

The solution is easy - remove the vac take-off from the manifold and fit it back to just in front of the butterfly where it should be. If you need to drill a port to accept the vac pipe take-off it needs to be sited 9/16" back from the carb to manifold mounting face, offset slightly to one side. I.e. NOT at the dead centre, or 'peak' of the butterfly bore. And usually set off away from the crankcase breather port. Usually the vac pipe take-offs fit a 1/8" diameter hole - but measure whatever you're going to use before drilling. You're looking for an interference/air tight fit.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users