Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

In My Opinion - Some People Try It On


  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#1 racingbob

racingbob

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,061 posts
  • Location: Hampshire

Posted 07 November 2016 - 12:31 PM

£8000 he is joking - look closely

 

 

http://www.ebay.co.u...tcAAOSw0UdXqFdp

 



#2 sledgehammer

sledgehammer

    Up Into Fourth

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,098 posts
  • Location: I'm sittin here besides my self

Posted 07 November 2016 - 12:52 PM

so a standard advantage - with bit's added

 

in Lamborghini White

 

 

love this - MOT HAS JUST BEEN DONE AND EXPIRES JULY 2017 ???

 

not worth asking price IMHO

 

edit just had a look on the PC - that is rough


Edited by sledgehammer, 07 November 2016 - 01:09 PM.


#3 Mrpeanut

Mrpeanut

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,019 posts
  • Location: Southampton
  • Local Club: Wessex MOC

Posted 07 November 2016 - 12:52 PM

Love the comment that the gearbox has been changed for the quick shift !

Still, doesn't look a bad little mini but never worth 8 grand.



#4 Archived2

Archived2

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Archived
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,093 posts

Posted 07 November 2016 - 12:56 PM

Looks rough! Lots of rust and obvious filler repairs.
Bit of a dog but maybe 2500 with the wind behind it.

8k? Someone's a greedy lil swine lol

#5 sledgehammer

sledgehammer

    Up Into Fourth

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,098 posts
  • Location: I'm sittin here besides my self

Posted 07 November 2016 - 01:12 PM

also selling Tongue Scrapers Job Lot Wholesale Stainless Steel 1200 Pieces

 

don't a tooth brush do that ?

 

yep def greedy with that mini - wonder if someone will buy it because of the colour


Edited by sledgehammer, 07 November 2016 - 01:13 PM.


#6 1984mini25

1984mini25

    Crazy About Mini's

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,784 posts
  • Location: -

Posted 07 November 2016 - 01:19 PM

Mot history makes interesting reading, lots of failures (twice in one year) and corrosion,

 

https://www.check-mot.service.gov.uk/

 

 

Check the MOT history of a vehicle

Registration number: D644ACX
 
  • Vehicle make ROVER
  • Vehicle model MINI
  • Date first used 1 July 1987
  • Fuel type Petrol
  • Colour White
 
MOT history of this vehicle
  • Test date 22 July 2016
  • Expiry date 21 July 2017
  • Test Result Pass
  • Odometer reading 33,761 miles
  • MOT test number 8891 7839 7402
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Fuel Pipe/s corroded ()
  • Test date 15 July 2016
  • Test Result Fail
  • Odometer reading 33,755 miles
  • MOT test number 5435 1723 5285
  • Reason(s) for failure
    nearside Headlamp excessively deteriorated so that the light output is severely reduced (1.7.5a)
    offside Headlamp excessively deteriorated so that the light output is severely reduced (1.7.5a)
    nearside front lower Front suspension ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
    nearside front Brake hose excessively damaged (3.6.B.4d)
    nearside outer Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded sill (2.4.A.3)
    front Brake pipe excessively corroded to rear (3.6.B.2c)
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Fuel Pipe/s corroded ()
  • Test date 10 September 2014
  • Expiry date 11 September 2015
  • Test Result Pass
  • Odometer reading 33,296 miles
  • MOT test number 3095 1325 4499
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Front suspension has slight play in a upper suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
    Front suspension has slight play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
  • Test date 9 September 2014
  • Test Result Fail
  • Odometer reading 33,296 miles
  • MOT test number 7783 1215 4220
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
    Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Front suspension has slight play in a upper suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
    Front suspension has slight play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
  • Test date 12 September 2013
  • Expiry date 11 September 2014
  • Test Result Pass
  • Odometer reading 33,188 miles
  • MOT test number 4652 3515 3266
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Nearside Front suspension has slight play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
    Offside Brake cable has wires broken but is not significantly weakened (3.5.1b)
  • Test date 5 September 2013
  • Test Result Fail
  • Odometer reading 33,188 miles
  • MOT test number 1072 8824 3232
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
    Offside Steering rack gaiter split (2.2.D.2d)
    Offside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
    Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
    Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Nearside Front suspension has slight play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
    Offside Brake cable has wires broken but is not significantly weakened (3.5.1b)
  • Test date 8 April 2013
  • Test Result Fail
  • Odometer reading 33,183 miles
  • MOT test number 2577 3859 3036
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Nearside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
    Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
    Nearside Steering rack gaiter split (2.2.D.2d)
    Nearside Rear Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
    Offside Rear Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
    Nearside Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
    Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
  • Test date 5 April 2012
  • Expiry date 4 April 2013
  • Test Result Pass
  • Odometer reading 32,514 miles
  • MOT test number 4297 5679 2043
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
    Rear Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
    Nearside Rear Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
    Offside Rear Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
    Offside Front suspension has slight play in a upper suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
    Nearside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
  • Test date 30 March 2012
  • Test Result Fail
  • Odometer reading 32,514 miles
  • MOT test number 4856 6049 2062
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Offside Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
    Offside Front Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
    Rear Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
    Nearside Rear Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
    Offside Rear Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
    Offside Front suspension has slight play in a upper suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
    Nearside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
  • Test date 15 March 2011
  • Expiry date 14 March 2012
  • Test Result Pass
  • Odometer reading 31,358 miles
  • MOT test number 9481 8497 1029
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
    Nearside Front Upper Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
    Offside Front Upper Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
    both rear handbrake cables slightly corroded
    Oil leak
  • Test date 7 March 2011
  • Test Result Fail
  • Odometer reading 31,358 miles
  • MOT test number 3096 3666 1037
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Direction indicators flashing more than 120 times a minute (1.4.A.2g)
    Rear Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
    Nearside Front Headlamp excessively deteriorated so that the light output is severely reduced (1.7.5a)
    Offside Front Headlamp excessively deteriorated so that the light output is severely reduced (1.7.5a)
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
    Nearside Front Upper Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
    Offside Front Upper Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
    both rear handbrake cables slightly corroded
    Oil leak
  • Test date 13 March 2010
  • Expiry date 12 March 2011
  • Test Result Pass
  • Odometer reading 30,290 miles
  • MOT test number 4734 9277 0067
  • Test date 6 March 2009
  • Expiry date 5 March 2010
  • Test Result Pass
  • Odometer reading 29,606 miles
  • MOT test number 1835 0506 9001
  • Test date 6 March 2009
  • Test Result Fail
  • Odometer reading 29,606 miles
  • MOT test number 6044 7586 9090
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
  • Test date 27 February 2009
  • Test Result Fail
  • Odometer reading 29,568 miles
  • MOT test number 5149 1865 9015
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Nearside Front Headlamp excessively damaged so that the light output is severely reduced (1.7.5a)
    Offside Rear Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Nearside Front Front suspension has slight play in a upper suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
    Offside Front Front suspension has slight play in a upper suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
    Nearside Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
    Front Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
  • Test date 9 October 2007
  • Expiry date 8 October 2008
  • Test Result Pass
  • Odometer reading 26,889 miles
  • MOT test number 1718 2238 7270
  • Test date 5 October 2007
  • Test Result Fail
  • Odometer reading 26,889 miles
  • MOT test number 9726 6897 7241
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Nearside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
    Offside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
    Offside Front Body has a sharp edge caused by corrosion (6.1.C.1)
    Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
    Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  • Test date 16 June 2006
  • Expiry date 24 June 2007
  • Test Result Pass
  • Odometer reading 26,503 miles
  • MOT test number 1205 2776 6169
  • Test date 13 June 2006
  • Test Result Fail
  • Odometer reading 26,503 miles
  • MOT test number 7447 6456 6128
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Offside Rear Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
    Nearside Front Front wheel bearing has excessive play (2.5.A.3c)
    Offside Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)
    Nearside Front suspension has excessive play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)


#7 scrumpix

scrumpix

    Speeding Along Now

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 453 posts
  • Location: Somerset
  • Local Club: Yeovil Mini Mania

Posted 07 November 2016 - 01:38 PM

If you had 8K to spend there is so much better for the money

#8 racingbob

racingbob

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,061 posts
  • Location: Hampshire

Posted 07 November 2016 - 01:44 PM

did you see the bottom of the door and around the headlights

 

what about the engine bay i cracked up when i saw that



#9 slidehammer

slidehammer

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,196 posts
  • Location: Surrey
  • Local Club: LSMOC

Posted 07 November 2016 - 01:48 PM

Look a bit of a tart up job to me, lets hope no one gets caught by it.



#10 Scousemouse

Scousemouse

    Speeding Along Now

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 358 posts
  • Location: Liverpool

Posted 07 November 2016 - 02:46 PM

All that don't mean a thing,MOT failures/rust and more rust......

we'll GLOSS over all the important things,because it's "WHITE"?? O_O ? sorry not white but "LAMBO WHITE"??? :ohno:  :ohno:

sort of ITALIAN EMULSION to be precise :D  :D

                                            

Nah I'll pass on this one me thinks



#11 Cooperman

Cooperman

    Uncle Cooperman, Voted Mr TMF 2011

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,289 posts
  • Location: Cambs.
  • Local Club: MCR, HAMOC, Chelmsford M.C.

Posted 07 November 2016 - 03:56 PM

It's 'fulla filla' - everywhere.

 

Probably worth around £2000 to £2500. The bodywork will cost, maybe, £3000 to get right or possibly more. 



#12 JBW

JBW

    Mini Mad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 157 posts
  • Location: Oxford
  • Local Club: Mini Fixers

Posted 07 November 2016 - 04:27 PM

Quote from listing

 

"The purchaser of this car shouldn’t need to do anything for a good few years to this car now and with the right care and attention can be a part of your life for many years to come."

 

Makes my car look brilliant (which it certainly isn't), Even my inexperienced eye can see how rough the body & engine bay are, lets hope nobody gets caught out & thinks its a perfect car.



#13 wile e coyote

wile e coyote

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,230 posts
  • Location: North Somerset

Posted 07 November 2016 - 05:02 PM

Hmm - not a bad car - but should have had obvious crusty issues fixed before cheapo respray - more money spent on blingy bits than mechanicals & body.....never worth 8K!..... well not for a few years anyway!.... I think seller is asking what it cost rather than what it's worth....



#14 neal

neal

    Speeding Along Now

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 318 posts
  • Location: Leicestershire

Posted 07 November 2016 - 06:11 PM

If they do sell it for that money the buyer is snow blind..........I am !

 

If they get anywhere near £4000 then I think we'll be quids in with our cars.

 

I bet the owner is practicing their sales pitch before applying to go on 'The apprentice'



#15 JCP

JCP

    Stage One Kit Fitted

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 74 posts
  • Location: Colchester
  • Local Club: Mini Cooper Register

Posted 07 November 2016 - 07:29 PM

No, just no. £8k??!! He's dreaming isn't he?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users