Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

1275 Engine Number


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#16 MrBounce

MrBounce

    Up Into Fourth

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,651 posts
  • Location: The Manroom in Ipswich

Posted 10 December 2016 - 02:31 PM

Yup - given the front plate that is definitely an Austin/Morris 1300 engine. However the gearbox is an A series casing rod change unit, and not the original remote unit that came with the engine - unless the ADO 16s ever had a rod change???  


Edited by MrBounce, 10 December 2016 - 02:32 PM.


#17 CityEPete

CityEPete

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,920 posts
  • Location: On my soapbox....

Posted 10 December 2016 - 04:11 PM

Bit of googling...

In 1972 the manual 1100 and 1300 A Series engines was given an overhaul. The new revised models boasted new gear change, rod change in place of the remote gear change. This however meant that more engine stays were required as alloy housing wasn't there to act as one. Also making a debut on this new transmission were "pot" joints. Designed so that they shouldn't break up, however they gave a much harder ride and if they did go wrong it would cost a small fortune to repair.

 

 

 

So it has the rod but no pot joints then?


Edited by CityEPete, 10 December 2016 - 04:12 PM.


#18 ryan22_lgm

ryan22_lgm

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,478 posts
  • Location: woolacombe, north devon
  • Local Club: north devon mini register

Posted 10 December 2016 - 05:04 PM

Yes it appears to be rod change but still has the old type driveshafts!




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users