collapsing front cones...
#1
Posted 16 September 2006 - 01:11 PM
Does anybody know appromately how much is this gonna cost in labor and parts?
Also whilst im at it, should i bother uprating the cones slightly or will it just make the ride more bumpy?
Thanks in advance,
Gortey
#2
Posted 16 September 2006 - 02:57 PM
don't know about labor costs tho. never done it myself.
#3
Posted 16 September 2006 - 03:06 PM
hi it might be that the knuckle joint on the bottom of the cone has worn through the nylon cup it the top arm which will lower the car there's more of a chance its done that rather than the rubber donut giving way and as for the new cones the adjustable ones are pretty much all the same i got a set for £ 20 from a show and there fine the knuckle joints are about £5 each and if you know some one that could do it for you just a drinkHi, was fixing my rear drum brakes (thats reliability for you) earlier and noticed that the front of the car was significantly lower on the right side than the left. Think it has to be the rubber cones.
Does anybody know appromately how much is this gonna cost in labor and parts?
Also whilst im at it, should i bother uprating the cones slightly or will it just make the ride more bumpy?
Thanks in advance,
Gortey
#4
Posted 16 September 2006 - 03:55 PM
Don't bother with adjusta rides.......99% of people never adjust them once they are fitted !!
#5
Posted 16 September 2006 - 04:06 PM
I have adjusta rides and adjusted them weekly until i found a height i was happy with so
Attached Files
#6
Posted 16 September 2006 - 11:14 PM
99% of people never adjust them once they are fitted
Which is exactly the point of them. They are not there to make it simple to keep adjusting the suspension height when you want to but rather to find a height which is comfortable and stay there as Murtle says. It's not simply a matter of turning the nut in order to set the height properly, for every height change it is really required to setup the rest of the suspension to compensate for the change (the tracking will need attention at the very least). Hi Los of course are best of all (being the original type that was poorly copied by everyone else) as they have a specially shaped spring platform to imrpove the way the spring interacts with the strut. This aspect of the design is patented and so the cheaper ones don't do it. It works well.
Oh and one last thing..
THE CONE IS THE NAME FOR THE RUBBER SPRING. THE ALLOY STRUT IS CALLED A TRUMPET.
#7
Posted 17 September 2006 - 09:00 AM
down here in surrey
dave
#8
Posted 17 September 2006 - 07:14 PM
I thought you needed a special compression tool to replace the cones or am I getting confused there? If i can do the job myself id much rather do that but i dont have any special tools.
Thanks
Gortey
#9
Posted 17 September 2006 - 07:19 PM
hi mate you can do it without using the special tools ??Ok, thanks a lot
I thought you needed a special compression tool to replace the cones or am I getting confused there? If i can do the job myself id much rather do that but i dont have any special tools.
Thanks
Gortey
#10
Posted 17 September 2006 - 07:23 PM
#11
Posted 17 September 2006 - 07:39 PM
Otherwise if you springs slip and catch your digitz, you'll probably never play the pianoforte or keyboard again!
Anywhoooo I've had Mini Sport Adjusta-Rides fitted to my Mini for the past decade and not had any problems, but I guess my springs are about due for renewing now.
Oh and I've heard lots of warnings about cheap/dodgy springs that have completely collapsed after a few hundred miles or so. The poster claimes to only buy springs that state the patented brands of "Moulton" or "Dunlop" on them, so I guess that means only purchasing ones from either Rover or a good Mini Specialist like Mini Spares.
Edited by taffy1967, 17 September 2006 - 07:42 PM.
#12
Posted 19 September 2006 - 10:42 AM
"Spring" is the correct name for the "spring" - Cones are what you pt ice cream inTHE CONE IS THE NAME FOR THE RUBBER SPRING
#13
Posted 19 September 2006 - 10:46 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users