A young guy came and asked me last autumn "These lines mean something, but I don't quite understand".
We looked it up, and the explanation could be more concise, but it left me thinking, and I told him, Paddy Hopkirk won the Monty 3 times with standard bushes.
I know that it didn't help him, but a asked him "Are you going to be driving that hard" ? If not, why fall for the bovine excrement ?
Paddy’s mini was red and white, so why have any other colour combo?
Tech has moved on since 1964, minis are good, but better with well setup geometry.
First. Please let me be quite clear that my post does not question the driving ability of "Ilmung" .
@ Midas. Fair comment. A 648 cam gives a lot of power on a circuit, but it is not much use to the average driver in normal town and country driving.
I have raced on Rose jointed suspension, and what fractions can be gained on a dozen corners can easily be lost on the thirteenth, where rubber bushes are more forgiving.
If Mr. Hopkirk can win the Monty with standard bushes, I just wonder whether the average driver is being sold a bush, from which they are not likely to gain any advantage ?
I agree here, however I think many of these fancy bushes are being bought up these days due to the poor quality rubber offerings from many of the retailers.
I ran with high castor angle for years on (Leyland) stock rubber bushes, did many more miles than Mr. Hopkirk did over much worse roads (tracks) and I can't recall ever needing to change them over a 15 year period and some 120 000 km. If you look about, these same bushes are still available.
I did try a set of these off set bushes in one of my Minis, I know they are popular, but I can't say I was crazy about them.