I can’t ever see that springs are a good idea-used to be a lot of posts a while back about them-some people absolutely raving about them-what are the advantages if any of springs?
My car had them fitted when it was restored, but thankfully the guy I bought it from saw sense and put rubber cones back on
Of the people I have asked, here and on other platforms as well as in person, the only 'argument' they have against rubber cones is that they settle / sag over time. Some think they give a smoother ride, but when further analysed, what this really is, is an under-dampened ride. Rubber Cones on their own have a fair bit of damping (shock absorber action) in them due to the nature of rubber, this is what Minis always had what seem like piddly shock absorbers fitted.
I have an open mind on the issue, to me, it's technical, not emotive as some seem to get bound up in. I spent over 3 months back in the 80's working with a Spring Engineer, his slide rule and the factory where he worked where we tried all manner of things - bee-hives, double springs with different rates, (so called) variable rate coils, even torsion bars for the rear suspension, Coils with Coil Overs - lots of different things. We took a base line of the stock rubber cone set up in the front and rear, with both Mini and Van type Trumpets. The minimum outcome we were seeking was to at least replicate the Rubber Cone with something in spring steel to get around the issue of sag over time. Anything we could achieve over that would be a bonus (I was seeking a slightly firmer rate for the rear).
In the end, we made a LOT of scrap spring steel, and we couldn't replace the characteristics of the Rubber Cone, let alone better it.