Jump to content


Photo

Major Fault Uncovered With Speed Cameras On 'smart' Motorways & A-Roads


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 mab01uk

mab01uk

    Moved Into The Garage

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,913 posts
  • Local Club: Mini Cooper Register

Posted 16 December 2025 - 10:01 AM

Another example below of over-reliance on technology by those in authority and just how often it does not work as it is supposed to, despite our governments assuring us their latest idea to improve our everyday lives is tried & tested to be completely foolproof....next they will be assuring us their proposed 'Digital ID' database can be trusted to hold all our personal details securely from hackers!  :lol: 

Speed Camera Scandal: Tens of Thousands Wrongly Fined as Government Admits Major Failure.
"Tens of thousands of motorists have had speeding penalties cancelled after a major fault was uncovered in speed cameras used on smart motorways and major A-roads across the UK.
More than 36,000 cases have already been scrapped after it emerged that a long-running technical glitch meant drivers were wrongly recorded as speeding, despite travelling within the legal limit. Police forces across the country have temporarily switched off the affected cameras while urgent fixes are put in place.
The problem affects variable speed cameras known as HADECS 3, which operate on Smart Motorways and some A-roads. An investigation found that the cameras were failing to synchronise correctly with electronic speed limit signs, creating a delay of up to 10 seconds when speed limits changed.
This meant motorists could be recorded at the previous, lower speed limit even after a higher limit was clearly displayed on overhead gantries. In some cases, drivers were fined, given penalty points or sent on speed awareness courses despite evidence later showing they were not speeding.
National Highways confirmed the fault dates back to a software update introduced in January 2021. It was only uncovered after several motorists successfully challenged penalties in court using dashcam footage, prompting a wider review."
https://thelocal365....s-major-failure

 

 



#2 PoolGuy

PoolGuy

    One Carb Or Two?

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 973 posts
  • Location: Bucks

Posted 16 December 2025 - 10:39 AM

Didn’t it work out at something less than 0.05% were incorrectly ‘caught’ speeding? Desperate journalism imo.



#3 MiniMadRacer

MiniMadRacer

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 899 posts
  • Location: Essex

Posted 16 December 2025 - 11:55 AM

So they will rectify the "points" and refund fines... what about increased insurance premiums, and those who lost their licence and maybe their jobs.... it might be a small error but the repercussions can be enormous.. and where is the repercussions for the"company" that got this wrong...as usual its one rule for us, and a different rule for them



#4 PoolGuy

PoolGuy

    One Carb Or Two?

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 973 posts
  • Location: Bucks

Posted 16 December 2025 - 12:08 PM

What do you think the chances are of anyone getting caught by this mistake more than once?



#5 mab01uk

mab01uk

    Moved Into The Garage

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,913 posts
  • Local Club: Mini Cooper Register

Posted 16 December 2025 - 04:44 PM

As said above those incorrectly caught speeding due to the variable speed limit signs changing from say 40 to 70 on a motorway gantry, while the delayed out of sync camera is still functioning at the 40 variable limit, will have had increased insurance premiums, a fine and those extra points may have also caused some to lose their licence and maybe their jobs as a result....they will not see it as desperate journalism. Often without investigative journalists and a free press willing to take up such injustices the victims would get no publicity, so allowing government officials and politicians to deny there is any problem and 'sweep it under the carpet'. 

Many of those wrongly convicted will now be able to seek compensation based on the impact it may have caused them, especially if loss of job or earnings has been involved.


Edited by mab01uk, 16 December 2025 - 04:48 PM.


#6 shera12

shera12

    On The Road

  • Noobies
  • PipPip
  • 46 posts
  • Location: London

Posted 17 December 2025 - 09:42 AM

That’s pretty concerning, especially given how long the issue went on. Fair play to the drivers who challenged it and got it looked into. It does highlight how important proper testing and oversight are when tech is used for enforcement. Hopefully lessons are learned from this one.



#7 Shooter63

Shooter63

    One Carb Or Two?

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,252 posts
  • Location: Essex

Posted 18 December 2025 - 09:47 PM

As said above those incorrectly caught speeding due to the variable speed limit signs changing from say 40 to 70 on a motorway gantry, while the delayed out of sync camera is still functioning at the 40 variable limit, will have had increased insurance premiums, a fine and those extra points may have also caused some to lose their licence and maybe their jobs as a result....they will not see it as desperate journalism. Often without investigative journalists and a free press willing to take up such injustices the victims would get no publicity, so allowing government officials and politicians to deny there is any problem and 'sweep it under the carpet'. 

Many of those wrongly convicted will now be able to seek compensation based on the impact it may have caused them, especially if loss of job or earnings has been involved.

 

I've got to agree with every single word of that

 

Shooter






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users