21963 Pistons
#1
Posted 09 April 2007 - 07:08 PM
Alan...
#2
Posted 09 April 2007 - 08:02 PM
maybe 'standard' and some Spi'd too..
hth,
Dave
#3
Posted 09 April 2007 - 10:37 PM
a cooper piston or late MG metro type. 10.1:1 CR, 8cc dish Nominal
maybe 'standard' and some Spi'd too..
hth,
Dave
Cheers Dave, you don't know if the G7 N49A means they are standard diameter i.e. not +20 etc.
Alan...
#4
Posted 10 April 2007 - 06:30 PM
a cooper piston or late MG metro type. 10.1:1 CR, 8cc dish Nominal
maybe 'standard' and some Spi'd too..
hth,
Dave
Cheers Dave, you don't know if the G7 N49A means they are standard diameter i.e. not +20 etc.
Alan...
no idea about the second number - probably batch/date or some such.
oversize usually has the +020 markings on them and not encrypted in code!
they are OEM pistons though so would be pretty sure they are on standard size - best get the mic out to check, can see if they are round/true as well then...
TTFN,
Dave
#5
Posted 10 April 2007 - 07:29 PM
#6
Posted 10 April 2007 - 09:30 PM
Alan....
#7
Posted 10 April 2007 - 10:09 PM
Indeed. well done.pistons are not round
Rebore from £70 ish - pistons, well depends which ones you go for... £60 for $hitters 21251s, £150 for 21253's for exampleanyone any idea of the going price of a rebore & 4 pistons
#8
Posted 10 April 2007 - 10:21 PM
Sorry for being thick long time since I've been inside an engine, what's the difference between the two?£60 for $hitters 21251s, £150 for 21253's for example
Alan...
#9
Posted 11 April 2007 - 08:22 PM
the 21251 are ok for low revs low compression use, or short life in a high compresion, high revs application.
They are a low compression piston 8:1 in standard guise... (blocks that have used these pistons ususally have a chunk taken off the top to get the CR back up)
there is a 21250 piston that is a better quality material having the same design with a wide ring configuration the same as the 21251
they have a massive oil groove in them.
The 21253 is a good quality piston with a competely diffent thinner ring pack for higher performance use.
The oil slot on the 53's also doesnt go 80% around the piston as it does on the 50,51's
so the 53 is the 'daddy' of the 2125x pistons... they are high compression as standard.
humbers will be on the underside of the piston - but you can notice them (the 21251) straight off with the oil groove being so big!
hth,
Dave
#10
Posted 14 April 2007 - 03:38 PM
https://www.plminish...p...STON&page=1
Alan...
#11
Posted 14 April 2007 - 04:03 PM
#12
Posted 16 April 2007 - 09:12 AM
Are these the cheap & nasty ones, or a reasonable choice?
https://www.plminish...p...STON&page=1
yep they are the 21253 (judging by the product code!)
ttfn,
Dave
#13
Posted 20 May 2007 - 04:59 PM
quite a bit of diference in the quality and design areas.
the 21251 are ok for low revs low compression use, or short life in a high compresion, high revs application.
They are a low compression piston 8:1 in standard guise... (blocks that have used these pistons ususally have a chunk taken off the top to get the CR back up)
there is a 21250 piston that is a better quality material having the same design with a wide ring configuration the same as the 21251
they have a massive oil groove in them.
The 21253 is a good quality piston with a competely diffent thinner ring pack for higher performance use.
The oil slot on the 53's also doesnt go 80% around the piston as it does on the 50,51's
so the 53 is the 'daddy' of the 2125x pistons... they are high compression as standard.
humbers will be on the underside of the piston - but you can notice them (the 21251) straight off with the oil groove being so big!
hth,
Dave
Is the 21253 representing a certain standard regardless of the manufacturer? Or is it a part number that only applies to a certain brand?
#14
Posted 20 May 2007 - 08:36 PM
other manufacturers may have their own numbering that cross-matches to a 2125x piston..
#15
Posted 20 May 2007 - 08:39 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users