Deck Height?
#16
Posted 19 March 2008 - 08:53 PM
cheers for the advice, I have some extra old school pistons from a triumph spitfire, so might indeed need skimming to match eachother
#17
Posted 19 March 2008 - 09:20 PM
...get a room
cheers for the advice, I have some extra old school pistons from a triumph spitfire, so might indeed need skimming to match eachother
Cool, I've got a set of Triumph 2500 Pi pistons fitted to S rods in the garage. I asked Ian Hargraves, owner of Avonbar, about this set up and he said that they worked well, but being flat top piston meant getting the CR down to and acceptable level could be a problem. He also said that people made the mistake of machining the S rods to fit the Triumph gudgeon pins where they should have machined the Triumph pistons to suit the Mini pins.
I got them out of a rallycross engine from a Metro that had lost oil pressure whilst racing at Brands. It had a 84mm stroked crank and with the 74.689mm Triumph pistons would have given 1473cc. I bought the engine for £125 as a gamble that it could be salvaged, but unfortunately the crank was scrap and the block was warped along the mains and through the cam bearings??? I am going to go for a 73.5mm-1380 build for my next engine, my latest car is not the striped out pseudo-racer that my Clubbie was and I don't really feel the need to go super mad with the spec.
Interestingly, the guy who sold me the engine replaced it with a lump that was fitted with one of the first KAD 16v heads.
Edited by pogie, 19 March 2008 - 09:44 PM.
#18
Posted 19 March 2008 - 10:02 PM
these spitfire's are far from flat topped... have a ganders SP_A0064.jpg 144.61K 8 downloads
pins fit the rods a treat, skirts have been taken down so they dont foul on the rods and they fit the bore like a glove, apparently these were the pistons everyone used in their 1380s when everything was in black and white way back when
#19
Posted 19 March 2008 - 10:42 PM
Oi, less of the black and white era jibes, I bought the engine in 1990 when I was already well into my 20s. We had colour stuff back then, I even had a VHS video that recorded in colour.
Attached Files
#20
Posted 19 March 2008 - 10:55 PM
why the valve pockets? because of the long stroke i assume?
VHS?! i thought it was reel to reel in the 90s...
#21
Posted 19 March 2008 - 11:07 PM
haha mossy would be proud of them babies!!
why the valve pockets? because of the long stroke i assume?
VHS?! i thought it was reel to reel in the 90s...
I'm not sure why the pockets are there but the engine was quite highly tuned with a high CR so it may have had a small deck height so it was probably just to clear the valves. I'm not sure what cam it was running, but it had to be hammered out of the block and it went straight into the scrap bin.
#22
Posted 19 March 2008 - 11:12 PM
i didnt bother reading ether your nigglie argument in a circle or at least not much so you may well have picked up on that already
#23
Posted 19 March 2008 - 11:33 PM
My pistons are 12thou above the deck at TDC, and its fine... to quote the engineers that said it'll be fine like that, 'it pulls like a train'
Edited by JetBLICK, 19 March 2008 - 11:34 PM.
#24
Posted 19 March 2008 - 11:36 PM
#25
Posted 26 March 2008 - 03:44 PM
thanks again, and usefull calculator!
x
#26
Posted 26 March 2008 - 07:37 PM
shame about the 1500, worth the gamble though!
these spitfire's are far from flat topped... have a ganders SP_A0064.jpg 144.61K 8 downloads
pins fit the rods a treat, skirts have been taken down so they dont foul on the rods and they fit the bore like a glove, apparently these were the pistons everyone used in their 1380s when everything was in black and white way back when
Oooooh look at the slits in those skirts
#27
Posted 26 March 2008 - 08:29 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users