50 replies to this topic

[Kam]

Hold on hold on hold on!!!

danny1 was 'indicating' what it might read, so was the computer but wheres the written proof of the computers work? Need a graph posting up really to declare the "winner", if you go again and its working get a printout.

When you want to have bragging rights you need that bit of paper to show round the pub!

This 'competition' aint over!

Do I sound like a sore loser?......

[bigmotherwhale]

hang on a sec i said 95hp at the crank that was pretty close!

[captainjack15]

Close, but no cigar!!

[Sprocket]

87 if its the Kent 274, or 80 if its the Swifty SW5, at the flywheel

You will never break the 90bhp barrier with an MPi, the ECU just cant cope

[nicksuth]

As I said in the original post, their computer (I think I said comupter???) had crashed so no print out available. The reading was taken straight from the old analogue readout from the rollers - 2 x dials = rpm and bhp. I didn't even notice them until we had finished and found out there was no curve!!!

They have offered to run it again when they have a new pc which I will take up just for the record. The main aim was just to get it running correctly which we have achieved as it runs very well now.

[danny1]

Hold on hold on hold on!!!

danny1 was 'indicating' what it might read, so was the computer but wheres the written proof of the computers work? Need a graph posting up really to declare the "winner", if you go again and its working get a printout.

When you want to have bragging rights you need that bit of paper to show round the pub!

This 'competition' aint over!

Do I sound like a sore loser?......

oh yes lol.
i got to admit wish my engine ran like that