
Pinto Conversion.
#1
Posted 08 January 2011 - 11:50 AM
see if if has been done before.
Cheers, Spud
#2
Posted 08 January 2011 - 11:57 AM
I like the Pinto but not in a Mini but somebody will have no doubt done one.
#3
Posted 08 January 2011 - 11:59 AM
Go with a nice modern lump

#4
Posted 08 January 2011 - 12:03 PM
#5
Posted 08 January 2011 - 12:05 PM
Minor axle would be a bad choice as they are so weak. If you want to keep a live rear axle then a chevvy axle cut down is better. For an independant rear axle, the mx5 has a useful frame to be modifiedHi. I was just wondering whether anybody had done a 2ltr pinto conversion into a mini? I have been curious about this and wondered if anybody has done this? My plan would be to run it with a type 9 gearbox, custom prop shaft and and a moggy minor rear axle. I am yet to do any measurements but was curious to
see if if has been done before.
Cheers, Spud
The ford pinto is a tall engine so would be a struggle to fit under a mini front, k series or ford zetec unit might be better is they are not so tall
#6
Posted 08 January 2011 - 12:32 PM
i think people overrate the power potential and reliability of the more modern conversions..... NOT EVERYONE IS LOOKING FOR THE SAME RESULTS FROM THEIR CONVERSIONS.....
#7
Posted 08 January 2011 - 12:38 PM
#8
Posted 08 January 2011 - 12:47 PM
#9
Posted 08 January 2011 - 12:48 PM
Only suggested the ford or rover options as he already considered a ford engine, both these engines have been successfully used on the type 9 gear boxesi think people overrate the power potential and reliability of the more modern conversions..... NOT EVERYONE IS LOOKING FOR THE SAME RESULTS FROM THEIR CONVERSIONS.....
#10
Posted 08 January 2011 - 01:03 PM
Only suggested the ford or rover options as he already considered a ford engine, both these engines have been successfully used on the type 9 gear boxesi think people overrate the power potential and reliability of the more modern conversions..... NOT EVERYONE IS LOOKING FOR THE SAME RESULTS FROM THEIR CONVERSIONS.....
i know and i didn't mean it like that mate. i agree with your sujestions as they work well with the type 9 as does the vauxhall redtop, all are worth considering but what i ment was that all the power and reliability isn't everything if thats not what you want in your conversion and was aimed at the people who say why not stick with the more modern/reliable/overdone/non origional honda/vauxhall/bike etc conversions....

#11
Posted 08 January 2011 - 01:05 PM
#12
Posted 08 January 2011 - 01:06 PM
#13
Posted 08 January 2011 - 03:36 PM
We run 2 pinto powered capri's and are prone to many ignition and carb propblems, to fit to a mini aswell you would have to put in hard graft to fit the prop tunnel.
Keep us updated on what you decide to do

#14
Posted 08 January 2011 - 04:12 PM
#15
Posted 08 January 2011 - 06:35 PM
Zetec is a relatively easy fit onto the Type-9 box as is a CVH. Vauxhall XE is pretty easy too but the bell-housing can be pricey which can be the same for the K-Series. I've a couple of friends with A-Series on the end of Type-9 boxes too if you want to keep a nod in the direction of originality - I was leaning towards this option with a BMW K100 head.
BOB is a bit of a pain from a management point of view as their ECU's all ran PATS in a form that is very difficult to bypass. Most people run them on BOA management (or just use a BOA to start with). Both give you in the region of 200 gee-gees out of the box but are serious boat-anchors.
For the rear axle I was planning to go independant with a Sierra diff mounted in a cage which formed a replacement rear subframe. Using a modified version of the original Mini rear subframe's front cross-member I would make a pair of replacement radius arms which mount on the same pivot points but replicating the Sierra trailing arms so the hubs and brakes mount to uprights on the arms whilst allowing the driveshaft to pass above them. Marlin did similar I believe. Coilovers to the original upper Mini shock mounts (suitably re-inforced) would mean the rear suspension geometry hasn't been messed with from the tried and tested stuff.
The part I hadn't worked all the way through yet is the steering rack as the current location would have it passing through the bell-housing. It would have to be under the engine as per most RWD cars so again the steering arms to the hubs would be different.
Iain
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users