
Royal Wedding What A Joke..
#31
Posted 29 April 2011 - 02:49 PM
Now tell me if im wrong but the coronation has to be done under the stone to be queen?
and the spelling mistakes are due to the fact im being rushed
anyway its my opinion.
#32
Posted 29 April 2011 - 02:56 PM
shes not our true Queen anyway as the stone upon which she was crowned was stolen and replaced with a fake so in the eyes of god and LAW she is not the true queen ! i close this convo with RESEARCH it!
god society is blinkered ...
game set and match.
That would make her not the Queen of SCOTLAND, if it wasn't so ridiculous to think the stone being lost would simply end the monarchy. As someone once said, research it. It's called the Stone of Scone, and not exactly a secret that it was stolen in the 1950s, there was a nationwide search for it after all. It was repaired and returned though and it is the real stone that now resides where it's meant to in Scotland, being shipped to Westminster as and when needed. The version of the story where it was replaced by a fake is an episode of the TV version of Highlander. Not everything you see on TV is real.
#33
Posted 29 April 2011 - 02:58 PM
Edited by danrock101, 29 April 2011 - 03:00 PM.
#34
Posted 29 April 2011 - 03:04 PM
it saddens me im 18years old and i can see our so called great Britain is crumbling beneath the the less well off and we have no way of stopping it.
#35
Posted 29 April 2011 - 03:05 PM
haha i had a giggle at the iceland partalthough it may have cost £70 mil of tax payers money... all of that has just gone back to the tax payers, IE the bouncers, the limo company, the dress company, photographer, the bakery for the cake, the registery office then the function room above the nags head, then easy jet for the flight for the honey moon. Forgot to say iceland aswell for all the party food.

#36
Posted 29 April 2011 - 03:10 PM
its a massively outdated institution, which as juju said, im unsure whether it has a place or purpose in the 21st century.
they definately should not be funded by tax payers, especially as they are now sell appointing.
Our monarchal history would also bring in a lot of tourism revenue. Where the kings and queens ruled, sat, visited, knighted, gave royal approval and royal decree etc. Emphasis on the past tense. France does really well with it's noble royal history and I'm sure English Heritage and the National Trust would be able to prevent the coffers emptying. We need a royal history not a royal present or future.
but with the amount of appathy towards the monachy, and positions of power in general by the younger generations (my generation) i cant see there being much support for them in years to come, once my mother and grand parents (from the good ol' days of the royal family) are no longer with us.
it is nice to see the country pull together though i will admit.
#37
Posted 29 April 2011 - 03:13 PM
#38
Posted 29 April 2011 - 03:14 PM

#39
Posted 29 April 2011 - 03:17 PM
My career in the armed forces was cut short by the politicians not the Royal family and its the same again for today's armed forces. Although the Royals are high profile they do a lot behind closed doors. A lot of them have served in the forces as well and are still serving. It's only their high profile plus idiotic journalists that prevent them from serving on the front line.
Breaking the backbone of this country, really!!! this country has been falling into a deep hole for years and its not been caused by the Royal family. Look at all of the governments first.
Even if we were to become a republic there would be no change as its the idiots who we put in charge that are dragging this country down plus the attitude of a lot people who bemoan everything and everyone.
We all need to do our bit and some do just that.
#40
Posted 29 April 2011 - 03:20 PM
It's only their high profile plus idiotic journalists that prevent them from serving on the front line.
Didn't Harry say that he wanted to stay out in Iraq or where ever he was posted, but couldn't?
#41
Posted 29 April 2011 - 03:23 PM
It's only their high profile plus idiotic journalists that prevent them from serving on the front line.
Didn't Harry say that he wanted to stay out in Iraq or where ever he was posted, but couldn't?
Again due to his profile with him serving in hot zones would make him and people around him a massive target. He managed to serve i believe 10 weeks in Afghanistan before he was outed by a journalist. He wanted to stay but due to the circumstances he had no choice but to leave.
Edited by sonikk4, 29 April 2011 - 03:25 PM.
#42
Posted 29 April 2011 - 03:26 PM
no offence but they are all massive targets, stick him in a helemt, give him a bergen with some webbing and he'd look just like any other soldier. only ginger.It's only their high profile plus idiotic journalists that prevent them from serving on the front line.
Didn't Harry say that he wanted to stay out in Iraq or where ever he was posted, but couldn't?
Again due to his profile with him serving in hot zones would make him and people around him a massive target. He managed to serve i believe 10 weeks before he was outed by a journalist. He wanted to stay but due to the circumstances he had no choice but to leave.
if they wanted him to remain hidden (from the media) on front front line i dont think it would be difficult.
#43
Posted 29 April 2011 - 03:36 PM
no offence but they are all massive targets, stick him in a helemt, give him a bergen with some webbing and he'd look just like any other soldier. only ginger.It's only their high profile plus idiotic journalists that prevent them from serving on the front line.
Didn't Harry say that he wanted to stay out in Iraq or where ever he was posted, but couldn't?
Again due to his profile with him serving in hot zones would make him and people around him a massive target. He managed to serve i believe 10 weeks before he was outed by a journalist. He wanted to stay but due to the circumstances he had no choice but to leave.
if they wanted him to remain hidden (from the media) on front front line i dont think it would be difficult.
I agree with what you are saying but all it takes is one loose tongue so to speak then what. Can you imagine the furore if that happened and the damage it could potentially do not just to him but the armed forces in general. Its demoralized enough as it is especially now with these latest cuts. At least he wants to be out there and not hiding behind his family.
Its the powers that be that are preventing him and William from going to the front line. The pressures involved are ridiculous and no matter what you do you cannot win.
#44
Posted 29 April 2011 - 03:36 PM
hang on a min grow up .. you tell me what they do then because im under the impression they do sweet fa other than look pritty ???and what do they actually do for this country other than sit on there ass??
Wow really? Grow up.
Well last estimates show that the Royal family provide £250 million annually on tourism and other extenuated activities to the British economy (not personal income or wealth), so you might want to stop slating them until you start earning that money for the country per year.
#45
Posted 29 April 2011 - 03:42 PM
thats very true, but you do have to wonder who is preventing him??no offence but they are all massive targets, stick him in a helemt, give him a bergen with some webbing and he'd look just like any other soldier. only ginger.It's only their high profile plus idiotic journalists that prevent them from serving on the front line.
Didn't Harry say that he wanted to stay out in Iraq or where ever he was posted, but couldn't?
Again due to his profile with him serving in hot zones would make him and people around him a massive target. He managed to serve i believe 10 weeks before he was outed by a journalist. He wanted to stay but due to the circumstances he had no choice but to leave.
if they wanted him to remain hidden (from the media) on front front line i dont think it would be difficult.
I agree with what you are saying but all it takes is one loose tongue so to speak then what. Can you imagine the furore if that happened and the damage it could potentially do not just to him but the armed forces in general. Its demoralized enough as it is especially now with these latest cuts. At least he wants to be out there and not hiding behind his family.
Its the powers that be that are preventing him and William from going to the front line. The pressures involved are ridiculous and no matter what you do you cannot win.
again traditionally, being a royal he'd be on the front line, they will be a target royal or not, a leader of men always will be (even not in war situations).
maybe now they dont wish to "take the helm" so to speak when THEIR contryman are led into war. to have people fighting for you and your family, regardless of the conflict, arguably they should be there and getting stuck in.
to argue it is too dangerous is a cop out, it is after all a war.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users