
1275 Snobbery
#16
Posted 09 March 2013 - 12:05 AM
Ac
#17
Posted 09 March 2013 - 03:14 AM
then the bhp takes over - BUT by then HERE's a corner and we start again....
Power to weight is everything. Tune a 998 to death it will beat a lazy 1275 day in and day out.
Don't look after any engine and it will disappoint you time and again.
As for ACDodd and his Physics.... Well, if physics was king he would have to give up on "love" and "oooh"
and the enormous grin on his face when he drives his Mini rather than a calculator or telescope.
Oh and don't forget nerves (when he races me) and don't forget driver failure (when he races me).]
Blah blah bleet...
Get a 998 clean and well sorted and it will give any 1275 a run for it's money.
#18
Posted 09 March 2013 - 08:48 AM
i would disagree with that.. i love well tuned 998s. small block power! and they keep up with the bigger boys rather well... especially the standard 1275s. heck they give a few euro boxes a jump at the lights too... in short... i got ruined by one in my cooper on the way back from beaulie ulast year :)
Thats not an achievement on the behalf of the 998, considering they came with what 40bhp and a MPI came with 62 as standard. Add 12 years to your car and your down to lets say, 55bhp at best. Assuming there was even 62 at the start.
A slightly tuned 998 is nocking on the door of 50-60bhp. Can you see where this is going?
Yep. This is going to the age old quote of 'wait till you get in mine Noah'

This arguement goes on and on and on and on.....
Mab01uk pretty much summed it up.
The 998 is a pretty robust reliable little engine.
It doesn't take a fortune to tune it (if you know what to do and what bits to use).
The only problem is the parts. Tuning parts for 998s are getting harder to find as opposed to 1275 bits. Hence why its getting more expensive.
But normally the people wheo scream 'fit a 1275' haven't had the pleasure of driving a nicely tuned 998 and founding out it can be a much more fun engine to drive, more economical to drive and more robust to drive.
Tuned 998 all the way. Mine certainly had no trouble keeping up and often passing the 1275 boys in the Club and then returned a good MPG when being driven to work. The only reason I haven't got the engine in at the moment is because I pulled it out for a refresh and just haven't had chance to put it back together.
#19
Posted 09 March 2013 - 09:08 AM
Intriguingly I have never actually owned a Mini with a 1275cc engine. Mine have been as follows: 998; 998; 1330; 998; 998; 1301 and now the Midas has a 1293 block ready to go in.
#20
Posted 09 March 2013 - 09:17 AM
#21
Posted 09 March 2013 - 09:26 AM

#22
Posted 09 March 2013 - 09:35 AM
I agree with the above. Even if a slightly tuned 998 isn't quite as fast as a standard 1275, if it's tuned well it will be that much more fun to drive. And being honest what is a Mini about, is it going fast or having fun? 1275s aren't fast, they're just slightly quicker. Either way, I don't think you'll be beating 911s or Ferraris anywhere
You will beat 911 and Ferrari with a turbo bolted on
#23
Posted 09 March 2013 - 09:40 AM
#24
Posted 09 March 2013 - 10:27 AM

#25
Posted 09 March 2013 - 10:39 AM
#26
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:12 AM
Torque>BHP.
Get a 1275.
I have to agree. I've driven 998s and 1275s, and while you unarguably can get excellent top end power from a 998, sometimes enough to keep up with tiring 1275s, it really is gutless low down in the rev range. I chose my 1275 MPI in the end because it has excellent low end torque. From as little as 1800-2000RPM, if you put your foot down it gets a move on which is really great for general driving. I rarely need to go above 4.5k if I want power, especially considering the torque is there lower down.
That was my greatest surprise overall with the 1275, it felt very much like a diesel in terms of low end torque, I've driven many other petrol cars, often their torque comes in around 3k which is not very helpful, as they drive like slouches unless you rev them. As holmsey said, there really is no replacement for displacement and getting good torque from a 998 is unfeasible.
Hope that helps!

#27
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:30 AM
#28
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:36 AM
but my egine needs a good refurb... which costos mucho de mondos unless someone can do it for me on the cheap:P
#29
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:36 AM
Torque>BHP.
Get a 1275.
I have to agree. I've driven 998s and 1275s, and while you unarguably can get excellent top end power from a 998, sometimes enough to keep up with tiring 1275s, it really is gutless low down in the rev range. I chose my 1275 MPI in the end because it has excellent low end torque. From as little as 1800-2000RPM, if you put your foot down it gets a move on which is really great for general driving. I rarely need to go above 4.5k if I want power, especially considering the torque is there lower down.
That was my greatest surprise overall with the 1275, it felt very much like a diesel in terms of low end torque, I've driven many other petrol cars, often their torque comes in around 3k which is not very helpful, as they drive like slouches unless you rev them. As holmsey said, there really is no replacement for displacement and getting good torque from a 998 is unfeasible.
Hope that helps!
#30
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:38 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users