1968 998 Cooper Engine
#31
Posted 24 April 2013 - 07:23 PM
A 998 will never perform like a 1275 and the torque of a 1275 is high even in standard form.
What you cannot have is a 998 which gives smooth and good low-end torque and then gives high power at the top end. You have to choose which you want.
So, a 998 with, say, a 276 cam, a 12G295 head, twin HS2 carbs, a lightened flywheel, higher compression ratio, etc., could give around 70 bhp, but that would be at over 6000 rpm asnd there would be little useable torque much below about 3800 rpm so, yes, you would need to rev it all the time to get it to go really well. Then a closer ratio gearbox would be better to keep it 'on the cam'.
As I have often said, the Mini is an old-design classic car and that fact is important to remember. Modern multi-valve multi-cam engines have different characteristics, but if a classic car is what is wanted the limitations of that have to be accepted.
#32
Posted 25 April 2013 - 09:27 AM
I wish I had a "rolling road" within 1000km of me.......I'd love to know what my 1098 puts out. Someone give me a guess:
1130cc ( 1098 +40 )
12g295 ( shaved to 24cc chambers......080" )
SW5
twin 1.125" ( sometimes I run an HIF38 with AAU )
LCB
rc40 equiv.
Now...as it's a long stroke engine I'm not going to be running at 6k + very often so may be hard to compare with a 998 running at 6600.
( I did install a better piston that doesn't have the ring below the pin )
63-65bhp at the flywheel - based on the fact that our engines are very very similar.
#33
Posted 25 April 2013 - 02:50 PM
I actually had 60hp in my mind....although the seat of my pants told me a little more maybe
Edited by Spitz, 25 April 2013 - 02:50 PM.
#34
Posted 26 April 2013 - 06:33 AM
#35
Posted 26 April 2013 - 08:55 AM
#36
Posted 26 April 2013 - 09:57 AM
#37
Posted 27 April 2013 - 08:39 PM
with the sort of spec you are proposing a 276 will require use of 5500 to 6400 rpm to get the best performance. That is a bit high for a road car and a 266 might prove better for road driving. A Mini is never going to go like a modern car as it's a classic car, so it will be best to make the best driving car possible. You don't want to have to use over 6000 rpm to get best power really.
#38
Posted 04 May 2013 - 09:33 PM
#39
Posted 04 May 2013 - 09:35 PM
#40
Posted 18 May 2013 - 11:03 AM
#41
Posted 18 May 2013 - 03:23 PM
#42
Posted 18 May 2013 - 03:26 PM
Found this website and this says there bigger than a 295 ? Little confused by the layout
#43
Posted 18 May 2013 - 03:45 PM
Edited by minimk1, 18 May 2013 - 03:47 PM.
#44
Posted 18 May 2013 - 10:26 PM
#45
Posted 22 May 2013 - 12:14 PM
found a cheap 12g940 head worked to about stage 2 or 3 would this work with the exhaust valves sunken in as i also have d top pistons and would be using a 266 cam so would clearance be and issue or not, also does sinking the valves work as-well as a pocketed block as sinking the valves would work better for me as transporting the engine would be a hassle as i am not completely stripping it of pistons and cranks etc
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











