
Bought a dodgy mini, legal help needed
#46
Posted 27 September 2006 - 02:38 PM
but I think the law is basically down to common sense.
I mean, if you were to use say, the front bulkhead, windscreen surround, A pillars, front door frames etc from the original vehicle, and then there were a mix of new panels (like floor panels, roof, rear seats, bootfloor, rear wings etc) then you used second hand front wings, doors, bootlid etc from the other car, then the original shell could possibly retain its ID.
But to claim that a car is 75% new when the 'core' of it isn't is another grey area (IMHO I think that the DVLA would not accept it as new at all) but I don't know enough about the subject.
It's all about what the DVLA interpret as being the 'shell really. Some cars have a proper chassis and can retain the ID with a shell swap (I can't really think of an example at the minute), minis don't fall into that category at all though.
#47
Posted 27 September 2006 - 02:49 PM
It's all about what the DVLA interpret as being the 'shell really. Some cars have a proper chassis and can retain the ID with a shell swap (I can't really think of an example at the minute), minis don't fall into that category at all though.
doesn't the vw beetle have a chassis which the body shell is bolted to? Thats what you mean right where the entire body can be unbolted and removed from the chassis and a new one fitted?
#48
Posted 27 September 2006 - 02:50 PM
i am also pointing out that no-one really know the identity of thier own mini so my comment is purely to say that people MUST/SHOULD be honest.
Look at it another way. I have bought 75% new panels to mkae a shell and I am using 25% secondhand parts.
In terms of SVA and aging a car I reckon this would pass for being a new shell.
I like your point about how much of the shell you would need to keep the originality of the GT.
I still go back to Trigers broom !!!!
Is classed as original even though its had many different handles and heads.
Isnt this just like 99% of all minis on the road today
#49
Posted 27 September 2006 - 03:09 PM
Not really, it maybe more common, but I can't think of one mini I know that has had a reshell in this way.I still go back to Trigers broom !!!!
Is classed as original even though its had many different handles and heads.
Isnt this just like 99% of all minis on the road today
At the end of the day, if you want clarification on the rules of reshelling, read the webpage on the DVLA website, or phone them yourself.
#50
Posted 27 September 2006 - 03:11 PM
#51
Posted 27 September 2006 - 03:19 PM
doesn't the vw beetle have a chassis which the body shell is bolted to? Thats what you mean right where the entire body can be unbolted and removed from the chassis and a new one fitted?
I was actually thinking of me dad's old Reliant Scimitar (old steel chassis with GRP shell) but I don't even know if it applies to that? Not sure about the Beetle.


#52
Posted 27 September 2006 - 03:44 PM
triggers hammer has had many new heads and handels but your new shell still has many of the original panels, if triggers hammer had only had many new handels but the original head it would still be part the original hammer.
you say you are not out to deceave people by claiming the new shell you are going to use is the original, then why not use the new shells id??
when dvla brought out the rules about reshelling it was mainly to cover ringing and unit constuction cars etc but why should be minis be different, its illegal to you use another cars original id.
this is my opinion and will differ from others.
#53
Posted 27 September 2006 - 03:49 PM


#54
Posted 27 September 2006 - 03:53 PM
#55
Posted 27 September 2006 - 04:13 PM
ie - mini body on a beetle chassis and still calling it one or the other.
to be ultra safe i have to provide receipts and pictures of the new and secondhand panels used.
i must also provide evidence where possible of the origins of the secondhand panels.
however to be 100% certain i have to call the "vehicle standards and engineering division" tomorrow morning.
for future info - a mini shell means just the body - no doors, boot lid, and bonnet.
so wish me luck and i will update you all tomorrow.
#56
Posted 27 September 2006 - 05:08 PM
I dont think "but on the phone they said it was okay" will carry much weight if problems arise in the future.
#57
Posted 27 September 2006 - 06:05 PM
dont worry i will ask for them to put it in writing
#58
Posted 27 September 2006 - 10:07 PM
Ok panels might only be £1000 compared to £3200 for a complete shell (£2850 less doors, bonnet, boot), but the man hours to assemble this large 3d puzzle must add up. Also knowing the heritage shell is made on original jigs, sealed and anti corrosion protected as a unit must make the cost seem worth it.
#59
Posted 27 September 2006 - 10:09 PM
#60
Posted 27 September 2006 - 11:07 PM
http://www.bmh-ltd.com/bodyshells.htm
These all steel bodies have been updated by the use of zinc coated steel in many rust prone areas. All bodies are electrophoretically primed. This process involves submerging the entire bodyshell in an electrically charged dip tank of special anodic etch primer. This process ensures superior corrosion resistance and is the same as that used by most major motor manufacturers.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users