Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

kent 286 cam - worth it on my engine?


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

#1 Daze

Daze

    Mini Mad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 213 posts
  • Location: Fareham
  • Local Club: P&SMOC

Posted 14 February 2007 - 05:05 PM

Hi guys,

I'm trying to decide on what bits to buy for my engine build. Let me give you a quick run down so far...

Its a 1275 Mg metro block & head, the head has been modified slightly - standard size valves, but gas-flowed, etc. Its having a SCCR gearbox on the bottom and SC drop gears too, as well as an AP racing clutch kit. Finally, it's also going to have a 45 DCOE on the back. That spec is what I've decided on, for sure, so far...

However, I am really tempted to change the cam for something hotter. A Kent 286 springs to mind, I've driven a couple of Mini's with this cam and its awesome. I love the lumpy idle too!

But, would that cam be too hot for my standard-ish Mg metro head? Would it be going to waste and actually losing torque & bhp?

I don't care about fuel consumption, noise, or the fact it'll be difficult to drive in traffic. Infact, that's a good thing - a challenge! However, I don't want to spend out too much more money on other things (eg, better head, overbore, etc)

Thanks in advance.

#2 Guess-Works.com

Guess-Works.com

    Gearbox Guru

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,838 posts
  • Local Club: Rugby Classic Mini Owners Club

Posted 14 February 2007 - 05:28 PM

You'll be fine with a 286... and with the webber very nice indeed...

#3 Udo

Udo

    Camshaft & Stage Two Head

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,670 posts
  • Location: Lincoln

Posted 14 February 2007 - 06:47 PM

Seconded

#4 Jordie

Jordie

    Traders Area Specialist Mod, North and Scotland Area Manager

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,567 posts
  • Name: Jordan
  • Location: North East

Posted 14 February 2007 - 06:48 PM

my 286 sounds lovely, need to bleed the clutch before i can drive it.

#5 E.L.M.O

E.L.M.O

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,953 posts
  • Location: London

Posted 14 February 2007 - 07:01 PM

what sort of power do you think dazes engine will produce?

i have all those parts spread out in a couple of engines and in spares, i might build one to similar spec

#6 Daze

Daze

    Mini Mad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 213 posts
  • Location: Fareham
  • Local Club: P&SMOC

Posted 14 February 2007 - 07:04 PM

Good stuff! Thanks guys!

Yep, I'll also be interested in BHP/torque figures. Anyone fancy giving a rough guess? :(

#7 E.L.M.O

E.L.M.O

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,953 posts
  • Location: London

Posted 14 February 2007 - 07:12 PM

would 90bhp be a feasible figure?

#8 Guess-Works.com

Guess-Works.com

    Gearbox Guru

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,838 posts
  • Local Club: Rugby Classic Mini Owners Club

Posted 14 February 2007 - 07:17 PM

With the right setup on the carb ( which will be the key ) yes, 90 at the fly should be well within range... you're realy only talking about a 25% increase on power over a std mg metro.

#9 E.L.M.O

E.L.M.O

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,953 posts
  • Location: London

Posted 14 February 2007 - 10:43 PM

25% isnt bad though. 90bhp will be nippy

#10 icklemini

icklemini

    Up Into Fourth

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,982 posts
  • Location: Northampton

Posted 14 February 2007 - 11:13 PM

hmmm
i'd prefer the sw10 and a decent SU on a road car. not a big fan of webbers on a roadie either....

sw10 is far more up to date design - like the 286 but better.., less lift at overlap gives a smoother idle, better economy (if used with a SU), and delivers the torque.

really: high hp figures are nothing if the torque curve is pants...

imho,
Dave

#11 E.L.M.O

E.L.M.O

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,953 posts
  • Location: London

Posted 14 February 2007 - 11:15 PM

hmmm u got a point. but the other way is alot cheaper?

#12 icklemini

icklemini

    Up Into Fourth

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,982 posts
  • Location: Northampton

Posted 14 February 2007 - 11:18 PM

hmmm u got a point. but the other way is alot cheaper?

other way?

#13 E.L.M.O

E.L.M.O

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,953 posts
  • Location: London

Posted 14 February 2007 - 11:33 PM

really? i thught the su etc wuld be pricey? this not the carse?

#14 icklemini

icklemini

    Up Into Fourth

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,982 posts
  • Location: Northampton

Posted 15 February 2007 - 01:13 AM

really? i thught the su etc wuld be pricey? this not the carse?


nar a single hif44 would work - twin 1 1/2 will be pricey but would be marginally better.. SUs have a lot of tuning potential, and sadly not often utilised.

webers are ok, but not variable choke so its more of a 'compromise' setup...

ttfn,
Dave

#15 E.L.M.O

E.L.M.O

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,953 posts
  • Location: London

Posted 15 February 2007 - 04:55 AM

ok. well i got a 1275 mg engine. how best can i get 90bhp out of it and how much would it cost?

sorry for hi jacking this thread :S




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users