Posted 10 April 2005 - 11:54 AM
Id Say that s/s looks and sounds better than mild steel, but peformance wise is there any damned diffrence?
Posted 10 April 2005 - 12:04 PM
Posted 10 April 2005 - 06:36 PM
Posted 10 April 2005 - 06:40 PM
Posted 10 April 2005 - 06:53 PM
My main gripe is from the back box my tail pipe looks bl**dy awful, and although most people are'nt behind me that long i'd like to leave a good impression.
Posted 11 April 2005 - 07:14 PM
Posted 11 April 2005 - 09:29 PM
Posted 12 April 2005 - 06:24 PM
Posted 16 April 2005 - 12:27 PM
Posted 16 April 2005 - 01:18 PM
single box on a narrow street at 2000rpm is a very nice low frequenzy tone... just today was driving in a multistorey car park and engaged 2 car alarms just by passing by... :grin:
Posted 16 April 2005 - 02:15 PM
Posted 16 April 2005 - 08:44 PM
Posted 16 April 2005 - 10:34 PM
my centre exit rc40 flicks up at the end, too...
why i dislike dtm? first it's a matter of personal taste. i just don't like the look. there's an obvious technical difference. as everything on exhausts is about gasflow it seems logical that a straight through pipe (through the backbox) doesn't hinder flow as the one-tube-in, two-tubes-out solution... (is it clear what i mean??) thus reducing performance gain...
when i looked under some minis i never had the impression that the centre exhausts were sitting lower... any other impressions from other people?
Posted 16 April 2005 - 10:46 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users