I hope the guy who wrote the article didnt read this..as hes probly in tears now. I bet he was fully chuffed about writing an article for a mag lol
oh - he has. See above
Posted 20 November 2008 - 06:29 PM
I hope the guy who wrote the article didnt read this..as hes probly in tears now. I bet he was fully chuffed about writing an article for a mag lol
Posted 20 November 2008 - 06:35 PM
Edited by Hughes, 20 November 2008 - 06:36 PM.
Posted 20 November 2008 - 06:41 PM
Posted 20 November 2008 - 06:52 PM
If the respondent thinks the Charles Griffin interview was turgid, that was a function of what Charles said, rather than what I thought. And if it was turgid, and I am useless, why was I the only writer/historian he would see in his retirement ?
Posted 20 November 2008 - 06:56 PM
Woohoo!!! I hit the nail on the head!!!!
Posted 20 November 2008 - 07:07 PM
Posted 20 November 2008 - 07:13 PM
Posted 20 November 2008 - 07:16 PM
you know what they say... is you dont have anything nice to say...... shut up
Posted 20 November 2008 - 07:24 PM
you know what they say... is you dont have anything nice to say...... shut up
Posted 20 November 2008 - 07:26 PM
Posted 20 November 2008 - 07:27 PM
I'm picking up on a trend here Anorak...when you're joking, do you put things in bold?
Joking!!!
Posted 20 November 2008 - 07:28 PM
OK, just re-read the whole of the article, whilst trying to see it from his point of view and ignoring the fact that he still insists the rad is in the inner wheel arch and I've come to the conclusion.........
he's definitely a pillock,
Posted 20 November 2008 - 07:28 PM
you know what they say... is you dont have anything nice to say...... shut up
![]()
good to see your finaly taking that advice![]()
Posted 20 November 2008 - 07:34 PM
Posted 20 November 2008 - 07:36 PM
JuJu, nobody asked you to be an umpire so you can get off your high horse ta.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users