
Unbeliveable, Misterious! 1275 Smoking After Rebuild
#76
Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:36 PM
There is no getting around it but i think that will be your next logical step, you have tried everything else.
#77
Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:37 PM
That is leaking down then !!??Did you do a leakdown test?
Yes, without success. The guy whom I borrowed the gadget warned me, that soo much oil will foul the test.
But at least it approved no gasket leaks, and pressure only escaped down to the sump.
#78
Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:40 PM
#79
Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:41 PM
#80
Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:46 PM
#81
Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:53 PM
#82
Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:58 PM
other things to consider is the material used for the liners and the ring type, and, whether the bores are actualy round top to bottom
#83
Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:02 PM
#84
Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:11 PM
When you fit the rings (first or second set) did you fit them dry to the bores first (before fitting them to the pistons) to check their ring gap? Did anyone ask earlier about the actual bore and piston measurements to confirm the fit of the parts is right? If the clearance is right, the ring fit and gap are right, that only leaves the condition of the bores as Sprocket said.
#85
Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:44 PM
The engine did only 1-1.5 hours befor the second ringset applied. The workshop did not rehoned the bores.
It should have had a hone with the new rings.
If you look in the picture you posted showing the cross hatch, you can still see the horizontal scoring from the boring operation. The hone is suposed to remove all of this leaving a 30 to 45 degree cross hatch. Once the rings have been run in the bore, new rings will need the bores re honing for them to seal efficiently.
Edited by Sprocket, 10 March 2010 - 10:46 PM.
#86
Posted 11 March 2010 - 07:38 PM
I have started my other engine today. Its a 1360 with stage 3-4 head. Its quite sporty I thing (built for my Cox GTM), and this is running without a puff of smoke. And the gas out of the breather is MUCH less then from the other engine. Something is realy bad there...
#87
Posted 11 March 2010 - 08:02 PM
hope this helps
#88
Posted 12 March 2010 - 06:05 AM
#89
Posted 19 March 2010 - 07:39 PM

#90
Posted 25 July 2010 - 02:16 PM
It was a nasty rather mysterious honing related issue. Rehoning the block to accept a 0.1mm oversized piston solved it though. Thanks for You input. Special thanks to Pumaracing on Pistonheads for his help.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users