Shocks Sit Deiffrent Heights....why?
#31
Posted 20 February 2011 - 05:14 PM
also the arch is lower to the wheel because when it started catching its cracked the weld down the join on the wing and the a plate....also cracked the wing under the scuttle.
#32
Posted 20 February 2011 - 05:16 PM
#33
Posted 20 February 2011 - 05:20 PM
#34
Posted 20 February 2011 - 05:59 PM
#35
Posted 20 February 2011 - 06:06 PM
#36
Posted 20 February 2011 - 06:08 PM
#37
Posted 20 February 2011 - 06:20 PM
#38
Posted 20 February 2011 - 06:20 PM
I would suggest though;
- The shocks/dampers have nothing to do with the ride height, although it does seem that these have failed to some extent as they are leaking.
- You also indicated that you straightened a bar. I would say it was likely the tie bar, I dont know hoe you did that, with it still on the car, maybe you had spinach for breakfast. how are the rubber bushes at the end of this bar, near the number plate?
- as above, the rubber cones will probably need replacing as with age they deteriorate and squash. Thats why your mini is lower on the drivers side as it has taken more 'abuse' by carrying the driver.
- the only definitive response i think we can give is that you should fit a bump stop, where its is missing (i forget which side), this however won't solve your issues.
#39
Posted 20 February 2011 - 06:23 PM
#40
Posted 20 February 2011 - 06:36 PM
#41
Posted 20 February 2011 - 07:48 PM
it was more of an arc at about 40degrees than full on bent. if you understand what i mean.
it appears that the ends of the tie rod are fine, by this i mean they both look the same, assuming the passenger side is ok
your right, im starting to think that its not something that could be answered on here from photos or info that i can give you all....not matter how experienced or smart you are, sometimes you just need to look.
if it was crashed damaged, it was never registered....but that doesnt mean it hasnt been.
ill have to take it to a garage that has a mechanic who knows about minis (still looking)
if i havent lost patience with the car between now and when i get paid ill report back and let you all know what it is or what they think it might be just incase anyones interested.............thats if i dont lose patience
#42
Posted 28 February 2011 - 05:35 PM
He said the knuckles look worn and the cones are no good (he used diffrent term) and both sides are to low but the driver side is worse due to there not been a bump stop there.
New cones and knuckles or just fit hi-lo's......does this sound right?
£45 to fit a pair of hi-lo's? Is that about right?
Thanks
#43
Posted 28 February 2011 - 05:40 PM
Ive took my car to a mini garage and he put it on ramps and spent about 20mins "doing stuff" under it.
He said the knuckles look worn and the cones are no good (he used diffrent term) and both sides are to low but the driver side is worse due to there not been a bump stop there.
New cones and knuckles or just fit hi-lo's......does this sound right?
£45 to fit a pair of hi-lo's? Is that about right?
Thanks
£45 labour charge to fit Hi-lo's to both sides sounds good value.
#44
Posted 28 February 2011 - 05:48 PM
It isn't a question of which but rather a fact that you should do both (although the hilos are not needed, as you could just use your existing trumpets). I know mate it all sounds mad - cones, knuckles and trumpets.
If your cones and knuckles are shot they will need to be replaced, instead of using a set of hilos to over compensate for sunk cones and knuckle joints.
Obviously changing every thing is more expensive, the really competitive labour quote wont change that dramatically
Edited by minisilverbullet, 28 February 2011 - 06:08 PM.
#45
Posted 28 February 2011 - 06:06 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users