
Mra Engineering In Liquidation
#106
Posted 20 November 2011 - 09:13 PM
#107
Posted 20 November 2011 - 09:20 PM
#108
Posted 20 November 2011 - 09:40 PM
Cant go wrong with Min-its, great guys and service there
Too right!!
#109
Posted 20 November 2011 - 10:45 PM
I can understand "both camps", those that support Martin and those that feel ripped off by him. There are always two sides to each situation involving dispute, but there is never an excuse for avoiding a customer. To avoid any suggestions of undue influence, I do suggest that Martin stands down from his TMF staff position until the situation is resolved.
#110
Posted 20 November 2011 - 10:54 PM
Not fully knowing the way in which Martin and Rick agreed the schedule of works on his car, I can only make observations based on what I have seen first hand.
Rick had his car in the workshop at MRA for a period of around 3 months to my knowledge, during this time it seems he removed the engine and box, ready for building to his specification. While it was there Rick decided to remove the front end of the vehicle for some reason, as well as destroy the wiring loom, The front end was removed in several different stages, at first this appeared to be due to some surface rusting on ther front wings, but later I was told by Martin that this was for a flip front, or fibreglass front end (I forget which) at this time he then added a load more to the original order. THis was the pattern of works that continued to occur during the time that Rick had his car in the workshop, towards the end he had rendered the car immobile by also stripping the front subframe from the vehicle.
He was helping Martin that is true, but in return Martin was allowing the use of his workshop - a fair deal.
Rick chose to pay cash, in some odd instalments - I have been shown some evidence of this, but when Martin tried to resolve the matter, he asked both Rick and his Father for copies of all reciepts issued for the cash he claimed to have paid - just in case there was any accounting error, these were never forwarded, and to this date still haven't been. Martin has shown me all of the reciepts relating to this sad story, sadly it seems that Rick does not have proof to back some of his claims.
I can't say why Martin didn't fight this, I can only guess that he was more worried about trying to save his business, and maybe get to a decent position with Rick.
However, Rick's actions and his candour on other fora show me that perhaps Martin was right to call the job to an end, there is no way on earth I would have entertained this sort of customer during my time in the motor trade.
Thanks for your time, as I have said if anyone want's help or liason then let me know.
#111
Posted 20 November 2011 - 11:15 PM
sadly it seems that Rick does not have proof to back some of his claims.
If a court ruled against MRA id take it that he had the proof
However, Rick's actions and his candour on other fora show me that perhaps Martin was right to call the job to an end, there is no way on earth I would have entertained this sort of customer during my time in the motor trade.
Martin was right to take £2700 off Rick in return for nothing? Nice
If he was unhappy with a customer he should have issued a refund and returned all goods belonged to that customer. You can refuse to do work for someone but you cant just be off with their money IMO.
Edited by Frisco, 20 November 2011 - 11:17 PM.
#112
Posted 20 November 2011 - 11:33 PM
#113
Posted 20 November 2011 - 11:46 PM
#114
Posted 21 November 2011 - 12:21 AM
As I have said I have known Martin for 20+ years.
Yes, I know a fair bit of what has gone on, I also know how badly this has affected Martin both personally and professionally.
Rick,
You have your judgement, it is a shame that it went the way it did, but please do not try to say that you were beyond reproach. Sure there were faults on both sides, you got in first, and painted a very dark picture, I have tried to redress the situation a little. Perhaps if you had provided this proof directly to Martin when he asked for it, you may have avoided the hassle of court action - it is unreasonable to demand in a threatening letter payment of monies, without proof of debt.
Ive met you, and have no axe to grind, just remember, your opinion is just as valid as others. It is a huge shame that your experience has ended badly, and I feel for you. Your protracted campaign against MRA on the internet will not help your cause though - it will make life very difficult for any recovery of the business.
I have only commented on the duration that I was aware of your car being at the workshop - i only pop in there when work allows. - I cannot think of any other company engaged in the motor trade that would allow you to work the way you did - most car enthusiasts need to rent somewhere to work - I know I do.
You complain that the directors of MRA are the biggest creditors - I think if you look at most limited companies of small to meduim size this will be the case - How do you think companies start? a nice donation from a bank?.
Oh, so you can check companies house, my full name is Sean Williams, I have nothing to do with MRA, or the new company, the only thing I have done for Martin is offer help, and advice when it is asked for.
As for my comments being "an ignorant load of rubbish" Rick, GROW UP! - nothing I have written is ignorant - it is just a few words trying to redress the balance, there are always two sides to an argument, it just seems that you want to continue to wage a personal vendetta on a public forum. It is common knowledge in the case of small claims court action, the appellant (you) is nearly always the winning party - and normally because the defendant (MRA) are too busy to attend, and cannot afford legal representation - you have your judgement, you have filed your claim with the liquidator, and MRA engineering no longer exists, anything that you do or say now against Martin is personal, and should be between the pair of you, not aired here.
Someone asked if I thought it was right for Rick to be down £2700?
My answer is of course no, it isnt right, but heres the sticky point, he never provided any proof of this - Bank statements that cover cash transactions arent proof that the cash was handed over, only a proper reciept can be regarded as proof.
This is my opinion, based on what I have been told. Others are entitled to their opinion, democracy is good like that.
Im not here to cause offence, nor am I here to be gobbed off at, I want to help, I am aware that there are disgruntled customers, and yes, perhaps if things had been handled differently the outcome may have been different, MRA survived for 8 years, and probably served thousands of happy customers, If there is anything I could do to help others resolve their problems tha have not yet been dealt with I would do so, just to ease the pressure on a good friend.
#115
Posted 21 November 2011 - 12:32 AM
#116
Posted 21 November 2011 - 12:36 AM
Someone asked if I thought it was right for Rick to be down £2700?
My answer is of course no, it isnt right, but heres the sticky point, he never provided any proof of this - Bank statements that cover cash transactions arent proof that the cash was handed over, only a proper reciept can be regarded as proof.
I cant see how he could have just forgot that he had taken nearly £3k off someone espicially given that the car was sat there for so long. Why should anyone provide bank statements to any company to prove they have paid, MRA should have their own files (I suspect they did)
#117
Posted 21 November 2011 - 12:42 AM
#118
Posted 21 November 2011 - 12:43 AM
With an alias of Jenbachertech I suspect you are in the Gas Engine/ CHP industry perhaps
Guilty as charged m'lud
Reciepts, yes, I have seen some, but not to cover the whole amount, by showing proof to Martin, any argument would have been beaten. it didnt happen, so things went the way they did.
#119
Posted 21 November 2011 - 12:44 AM
#120
Posted 21 November 2011 - 12:48 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users