Just so no-one blows themselves up, gets fined, or fails their MOT, I would point out that if the fuel line passes through the passenger cabin (a good idea, as it protects it from damage), it must be continuous with no joints, and made of an approved material. You should use steel fuel pipe for maximum safety, and a good grommet at each bulkhead.
Unfortunately, having the filler in the boot is completely illegal, and has been for a long time, and is downright dangerous. To do it legally you would have to fit substantial drains and vents to the boot, and fully seal the rear bulkhead (welding up the gap at the sides would severely disfigure the side panels), so the boot becomes a completely seperate, vented space.
Now you could get rid of the spare wheel well, and weld in a flat floor. Yes, I know it is a modification to the monocoque, so may attract IVA, but I think that most MOT testers would not report you for it, so it might be ok. The tank could then go under the floor, and you could weld in a sort of tunnel to keep the filler neck in the underfloor space, not the boot, and that, if done correctly (watch out for sharp bits penetrating the tank during a rear impact, you may have to box the rear subframe crossmember to eliminate its forward facing edges for that reason) it should be both safe and legal.
I think that the real way forward is to run the fuel line inside, and do something about the tank neck to prevent siphoning. A fine mesh welded in, well down the neck, would prevent the insertion of a hose, but don't do welding on a tank that has ever contained fuel, without it being properly purged by a qualified expert! That method is not seriously disfiguring to the bodywork.
I see a market for someone with the capability to offer modified tanks on an exchange basis.
Edited by tiger99, 08 September 2012 - 11:07 PM.