Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Mini 0-60 - Why So Slow?


  • Please log in to reply
51 replies to this topic

#31 AndyMiniMad.

AndyMiniMad.

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,295 posts
  • Location: Under The Bonnet.

Posted 12 May 2012 - 04:04 PM

Why bother with a 0-60 time...It means nothing!! the mini is not designed for a drag strip!! But stick it on a twisty B road and it will munch much more powerfull cars...My 1380 does go well enough to keep up at the traffic light grand prix though!!

#32 CCX

CCX

    Super Mini Mad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 517 posts
  • Location: Cambs
  • Local Club: Mini Cooper Register

Posted 12 May 2012 - 04:05 PM

I wouldn't call the Mini's acceleration bad, as even some modern cars have slower 0-60 times. I think the main reason for their acceleration not being on par with modern, similarly powered city cars is that they only have a 4-speed 'box. This is especially true of the later MPi Minis, because their fourth gear was similar as the SPi's third, for more dignified motorway cruising - this obviously didn't help 0-60 times.

#33 Artful Dodger

Artful Dodger

    " I AM THE SPECIAL ONE"

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,435 posts
  • Local Club: aint no body got time fo dat

Posted 12 May 2012 - 04:09 PM




errr not really, a 1000cc mini engine only really roduces 70 bhp, i see modern engines putting our 80 - 90 bhp easily


More like 35hp, if we're comparing stock vs stock. Don't forget 4 gears and the aerodynamics of a hose brick.


really??? bahaha thats poor


Why bother contributing to a topic you know nothing about?


woowww that a little unfair now isntit? you dont even know me or what i know, i just was unsure on how much BHP a 1000cc mini engine put out.

#34 conlad

conlad

    Previously known as ct16mini.

  • Noobies
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,054 posts
  • Location: West midlands
  • Local Club: Hilltop Minis

Posted 12 May 2012 - 04:20 PM

Attached File  istock_can-of-worms.jpg   25.24K   2 downloads

#35 Tommyboy12

Tommyboy12

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,255 posts
  • Location: Peterborough

Posted 12 May 2012 - 05:12 PM

Also - please point me in the direction of some modern 1.0s with 90 bhp! Current Ford Ka 1.3 is ~75hp, and iirc the previous one was about 60hp


Ford EcoBoost 1.0 125bhp...

Just sayin...

#36 mini-luke

mini-luke

    Postman Pat

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,362 posts
  • Location: Hereford

Posted 12 May 2012 - 05:17 PM

You could get 125hp from an 998 A-Series too if it had direct fuel injection and a turbo...

#37 racingbob

racingbob

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,061 posts
  • Location: Hampshire

Posted 12 May 2012 - 05:18 PM

just remember all these new cars weigh heaps more !!!

#38 Twisty

Twisty

    Super Mini Mad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 576 posts
  • Location: Bristol

Posted 12 May 2012 - 05:22 PM

the reason a mini is not as quick 0 - 60 is simple its called evolution of technology and aerodynamics and old age.

You ever tried to run as fast as you used to? I have and i cant. A few horses have certainly left my stable.

#39 Cerberus

Cerberus

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 989 posts
  • Location: near Leicester

Posted 12 May 2012 - 05:30 PM

This is especially true of the later MPi Minis, because their fourth gear was similar as the SPi's third, for more dignified motorway cruising - this obviously didn't help 0-60 times.


Think you've got that the wrong way round.

4th is usually a 1:1 ratio, to get better crusing (i.e. lower revs for cruising), you'd have to go below 1:1, so 0.8:1 or something, whereas third gear would be 1.x:1.

Although apparently, the MPIs 4th gear ratio was still 1:1 Link. I would presume it would be the diff ratio which would be different.

#40 racingbob

racingbob

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,061 posts
  • Location: Hampshire

Posted 12 May 2012 - 05:31 PM

the reason a mini is not as quick 0 - 60 is simple its called evolution of technology and aerodynamics and old age.

You ever tried to run as fast as you used to? I have and i cant. A few horses have certainly left my stable.


i can hardly walk never mind run !!!!

#41 Daviewonder

Daviewonder

    Needs an extra inch!!

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,020 posts
  • Location: England

Posted 12 May 2012 - 05:43 PM

How come my 17 year old Cousin can run faster than my 86 year old Nan?

#42 vik

vik

    Passed Test

  • Noobies
  • PipPip
  • 27 posts

Posted 12 May 2012 - 06:26 PM

lol ^ good example. It's why I find the whole mini 'scene' a bit silly now. Fair enough, we all have to start somewhere and ask questions. But it'd be nice if they tried to think about the answer themselves first.


If you actually read the original post, and my following posts, I have done that.

Two whole pages and only two people have addressed the topic directly! Everyone else is either completely missing the point, getting defensive, or talking about how fast their mini does or doesn't go!

#43 vik

vik

    Passed Test

  • Noobies
  • PipPip
  • 27 posts

Posted 12 May 2012 - 06:38 PM


Also - please point me in the direction of some modern 1.0s with 90 bhp! Current Ford Ka 1.3 is ~75hp, and iirc the previous one was about 60hp


Ford EcoBoost 1.0 125bhp...

Just sayin...


That's a brand brand new engine, that isn't even out yet, which is meant to replace the 1.6 in the Ford Focus. My point was your average 1.0 is still not making 90bhp.

#44 Ethel

Ethel

    ..is NOT a girl!

  • TMF Team
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 26,146 posts
  • Local Club: none

Posted 12 May 2012 - 06:43 PM

There's absolutely nothing up with the Mini's "technology", it's just basic physics....

35 horses will push a 6-700kg Mini just as well as 70 pushes a modern hatch-blob weighing in at twice as much - BUT the hatch-blob doesn't also have twice the frontal area to push through the air. So, as you go faster more of what power you have is needed to overcome the wind resistance. In fact oodles more, as the relationship between the air speed 'n power is cubic.

You're really looking at this the wrong way round, Minis are stupendously quick at low speeds, considering their dinky engines, because they are hand crafted from fairy dust compared to the modern bloaters.

http://www.bbc.co.uk...t_Engines_Dont/ - the first episode was even better at explaining how being 'ickle rocks if you can track it down.




#45 miniman24

miniman24

    Camshaft & Stage Two Head

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,696 posts
  • Location: Up North

Posted 12 May 2012 - 06:49 PM

All that aside, my 998 keeps up with my Grandads Citroen C1 to 60, the C1 is maybe half a second quicker as it dosnt have a knackered syncro on second :lol: Its the same with me driving the Mini or my Grandad driving it, so its not bad driving from Grandad :D Past 60, the C1 takes it though.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users