44 replies to this topic

[gaspen]

None of them are that useful, the secondary spring is too tight.

Ac

 

Thanks 

[gaspen]

Is it possible that the strength of both springs won't allow full advance ?

 

On this unit I mesured almost 20 degrees with protactor, but only 13 on the machine.

 

I welded up for 11, now I measure 8 on the machine

 

 20260113_135623.jpg   38.97K   2 downloads

[ACDodd]

Yes this is common, however it will usually get to full advance by about 9000rpm!!

Ac

[68+86auto]

Is it possible that the strength of both springs won't allow full advance ?

 

On this unit I mesured almost 20 degrees with protactor, but only 13 on the machine.

 

I welded up for 11, now I measure 8 on the machine

 

20260113_135623.jpg

 

Can you put up the test results?

[gaspen]

 

Is it possible that the strength of both springs won't allow full advance ?
 
On this unit I mesured almost 20 degrees with protactor, but only 13 on the machine.
 
I welded up for 11, now I measure 8 on the machine
 
20260113_135623.jpg

 
Can you put up the test results?

 

 
Yes, here they are. The red graph shows the test results. The black is one from CSI curves which with a little mod, which I think that should be good for the std. 998. 
 
As I said before I have two of these dizzys.

 

BAU1962/A is my friend's unit

 

BAU192/B is mine after some "tuning".

 

The pictures shows the dwell values at 500 (left) and 3000 (right) dizzy rpm. What causes the difference ?
 
 bau_bali.JPG   24.18K   2 downloads  BAU_Beni.JPG   24.37K   3 downloads

 

 dwell_bali.jpg   53.58K   5 downloads  dwell_beni.jpg   49.97K   5 downloads

 

[68+86auto]

 

 

Is it possible that the strength of both springs won't allow full advance ?
 
On this unit I mesured almost 20 degrees with protactor, but only 13 on the machine.
 
I welded up for 11, now I measure 8 on the machine
 
20260113_135623.jpg

 
Can you put up the test results?

 

 
Yes, here they are. The red graph shows the test results. The black is one from CSI curves which with a little mod, which I think that should be good for the std. 998. 
 
As I said before I have two of these dizzys.

 

BAU1962/A is my friend's unit

 

BAU192/B is mine after some "tuning".

 

The pictures shows the dwell values at 500 (left) and 3000 (right) dizzy rpm. What causes the difference ?
 
bau_bali.JPG BAU_Beni.JPG

 

dwell_bali.jpg dwell_beni.jpg

 

 

 

 

Is it possible that the strength of both springs won't allow full advance ?
 
On this unit I mesured almost 20 degrees with protactor, but only 13 on the machine.
 
I welded up for 11, now I measure 8 on the machine
 
20260113_135623.jpg

 
Can you put up the test results?

 

 
Yes, here they are. The red graph shows the test results. The black is one from CSI curves which with a little mod, which I think that should be good for the std. 998. 
 
As I said before I have two of these dizzys.

 

BAU1962/A is my friend's unit

 

BAU192/B is mine after some "tuning".

 

The pictures shows the dwell values at 500 (left) and 3000 (right) dizzy rpm. What causes the difference ?
 
bau_bali.JPG BAU_Beni.JPG

 

dwell_bali.jpg dwell_beni.jpg

 

 

 

Are these hall effect or inductive?

[gaspen]

 

 

 

Is it possible that the strength of both springs won't allow full advance ?
 
On this unit I mesured almost 20 degrees with protactor, but only 13 on the machine.
 
I welded up for 11, now I measure 8 on the machine
 
20260113_135623.jpg

 
Can you put up the test results?

 

 
Yes, here they are. The red graph shows the test results. The black is one from CSI curves which with a little mod, which I think that should be good for the std. 998. 
 
As I said before I have two of these dizzys.

 

BAU1962/A is my friend's unit

 

BAU192/B is mine after some "tuning".

 

The pictures shows the dwell values at 500 (left) and 3000 (right) dizzy rpm. What causes the difference ?
 
bau_bali.JPG BAU_Beni.JPG

 

dwell_bali.jpg dwell_beni.jpg

 

 

 

 

Is it possible that the strength of both springs won't allow full advance ?
 
On this unit I mesured almost 20 degrees with protactor, but only 13 on the machine.
 
I welded up for 11, now I measure 8 on the machine
 
20260113_135623.jpg

 
Can you put up the test results?

 

 
Yes, here they are. The red graph shows the test results. The black is one from CSI curves which with a little mod, which I think that should be good for the std. 998. 
 
As I said before I have two of these dizzys.

 

BAU1962/A is my friend's unit

 

BAU192/B is mine after some "tuning".

 

The pictures shows the dwell values at 500 (left) and 3000 (right) dizzy rpm. What causes the difference ?
 
bau_bali.JPG BAU_Beni.JPG

 

dwell_bali.jpg dwell_beni.jpg

 

 

 

Are these hall effect or inductive?

 

 

Inductive

[ACDodd]

Dwell looks much to short on the second dizzy, try a replacement module.

Ac

[gaspen]

Dwell looks much to short on the second dizzy, try a replacement module.

Ac

 

You mean the 1st one? Dwell is where the ligth is OFF

[ACDodd]

Yes I understand, the dwell looks much too short.

Ac

[gaspen]

Yes I understand, the dwell looks much too short.

Ac

 

I am confused 

 

Unit A : 8 degrees dwell on ~500, 22 d's ~3000 (distributor rpm)

 

Unit B : 22 / 50 degrees

 

I think unit A is faulty, isn't it ?

[ACDodd]

Yes b is as expected.

Ac

[gaspen]

Well, one learns something every day

 

 Képkivágás.JPG   35.97K   0 downloads

[panky]

I wondered why there was a brass blade on my set of feelers.

[gaspen]

Not that chinese junk 

 

https://photos.app.g...HCHBB2ot2FsVmf6