Edited by nicksuth, 07 August 2009 - 09:59 PM.
Speeding Penalties...
#16
Posted 07 August 2009 - 09:58 PM
#17
Posted 07 August 2009 - 10:45 PM
agree though that they do tempt people to speed, as said previously.
#18
Posted 08 August 2009 - 10:37 AM
Commiserations .... and congratulations. Don't you feel just a teensy bit pleased with Matilda?
What?! For getting caught doing 50mph? No, nothing to be proud of, she can do 50 in her sleep.....and so can I.....err....
Nothing in the post this am, so I didn't get caught on wednesday.......
#20
Posted 09 August 2009 - 02:30 PM
see if there is a camera there if so buy a push bike if not then you no it was a mobile camera van
#21
Posted 10 August 2009 - 07:35 AM
The cheeky mo-fos have turned the second camera on the Northbound carriageway around to face the Southbound carriageway.
There are no road markings on the Southbound section.
Oddly enough, there was NOBODY speeding on the A217 this morning.
I think they may have caught LOADS of people, and I mean looooooooooooooooooads.
Erm pushbike.....weeeeell, I went out on my old training route on the trails this weekend, and I've b*ggered my SIDs. Oil escaping everywhere.
I've got another bike, but I ain't taking a singlespeed cruiser up Boxhill every morning to get to work. It will be pubic transport for me if I've lost my licence.
#22
Posted 10 August 2009 - 07:40 AM
#23
Posted 10 August 2009 - 08:34 AM
#24
Posted 10 August 2009 - 08:38 AM
But I'm sure if the markings aren't there the ticket isn't enforcable. I may be wrong, but I'm sure I was told that
#25
Posted 10 August 2009 - 09:10 AM
#26
Posted 10 August 2009 - 09:14 AM
as once you sign that form its to later you have plead guilty to some thing you may not have done or they can prove
know of a case where they said a biker was doing 48mph in a 30 he knew he was not asked for the evidance and low and behold when counting how many lines he crossed between the first and the second photo he was doing 28mph
there explaination was the camera had picked up the bus coming the other way ,when asked why was not checked said they did not have the time to check every one sent out
so much for inocent till proven guilty !!!!
and they have to send you the nips notifiaction within 2 weeks of the offence other wise its not valid and they cant do you for it
safty camers my arse , the signs that show your speed will slow most people down camers dont slow you done till after is made some money
speed signs cost 5 grand camers 25 grand each so thay could have 5 times as many speed signs surly that would save more lives and crashes
Edited by THE STIG, 10 August 2009 - 09:15 AM.
#27
Posted 10 August 2009 - 10:13 AM
I've signed & posted my NIP form now.
This is where we were clocked:
Pretend the convertible is Matilda...
I can ask for photographic evidence only when challenging the charge if it gets to court, apparently.
#28
Posted 10 August 2009 - 11:47 AM
there was a on going case in the lord courts becuse by signing the nips your pleadying guilty to a offence and you have not been read your rights or provided with the evidence to mount a defence
comes under the under the police pace act
bacicly your incriminating yourself, when they have to prove your guilt ,dont not if there has been a out come
#29
Posted 10 August 2009 - 11:55 AM
dont know about that i sent my nips back asking for evidence and got the pics back
there was a on going case in the lord courts becuse by signing the nips your pleadying guilty to a offence and you have not been read your rights or provided with the evidence to mount a defence
comes under the under the police pace act
bacicly your incriminating yourself, when they have to prove your guilt ,dont not if there has been a out come
Ah well. Points & a fine for Juju then. *Swear words*.
#30
Posted 10 August 2009 - 12:19 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users