Speeding Penalties...
#31
Posted 10 August 2009 - 01:27 PM
The Marks on the road are for 2nd checks only.
#32
Posted 10 August 2009 - 01:50 PM
I was looking at the wrong camera.
The nice people on www.pepipoo.com have pointed me in the right direction.
The camera that snapped me monitors both carriageways. I had no idea!!
What a spaz.
#33
Posted 10 August 2009 - 01:52 PM
Edited by Angelic_Fruitcake, 10 August 2009 - 01:53 PM.
#34
Posted 10 August 2009 - 02:13 PM
Oh no does that mean it's got you more than once....?
Only time & the postman, will tell. I hope not.
#35
Posted 10 August 2009 - 02:15 PM
#36
Posted 11 August 2009 - 07:53 PM
I'd definately contest it though, ask for the photographs, and the proof of calibration of the camera, etc. If you're going to be done for it you may as well try fight it. You might think it's a bad attitude to take but at the end of the day, you didn't do any harm doing 50 did you? Yet you're getting punished when they could be better spending money on taking dangerous, drunk, uninsured and unlicensed drivers off the road.
Rant over
#37
Posted 12 August 2009 - 08:42 AM
There.
Does that feel better?
If you had read my more recent posts in this thread you would have realised that I had in fact been looking at the WRONG camera on Google. The camera that clocked us was a gatso monitoring both North & South carriageways. There are markings on both carriageways. It is, as they say, I fair cop. I is banged to rights, Guv'nor. No contest. Just have to wait and see whether it's 3 points & 60 quid, or a speed awareness course & 60 quid....
For those who like to hootle it around Surrey, you might find this website quite useful.
#38
Posted 12 August 2009 - 09:20 AM
#39
Posted 12 August 2009 - 09:27 AM
Not wanting to get into issues of personal responsibility, nor am I saying you aren't taking responsibility. But surely if you were doing 60 in a 50 and you knew were at the time (that hasn't been disputed has it?), it doesn't matter where the camera was/is or whether there were markings there or not?
It was 50 in a 40. I didn't know I was doing it. It wouldn't surprise me if it's true, though! Aaaaaaaaaaand, the markings are no longer an issue!!
#40
Posted 12 August 2009 - 07:04 PM
He informed me that every camera you see represents 3 deaths on that particular stretch of road in the last two years... attributed directly to speeding and general road-based numptyism from drivers.
Makes you think, doesn't it?
#41
Posted 12 August 2009 - 07:29 PM
#42
Posted 12 August 2009 - 07:33 PM
#43
Posted 12 August 2009 - 07:40 PM
Got my "conditional offer" through the post this morning. I only posted the thing back to them on the weekend. I thought the wheels of bureaucracy were supposed to revolve at a geological speed?
I will have £60 less in my bank account & 3 lovely points on my licence. And what do points make???!!!
#44
Posted 12 August 2009 - 07:45 PM
Don't forget to ask if they want to buy a calendar when you pay.
ps wots a FATSO cam? - we don't have anything like that in North Yorkshire
#45
Posted 12 August 2009 - 07:51 PM
Take 30 squid out of Matilda's pocket money, only fair she goes halves.
It's all her fault anyway. She's never getting any pocket money again. I've never had a criminal record before (apart from Kajagoogoo). She's a bad influence.
Don't forget to ask if they want to buy a calendar when you pay.
Sure thing, Chief!
ps wots a FATSO cam? - we don't have anything like that in North Yorkshire
Well, down here in the South East (also known as the Land of the Body Fascist) all morbidly obese people must be taken out of public view. It's just safer that way. They get caught on film, and a team of forklifts is sent out to catch them & haul them into the Pound.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users