
Emo - Stolen
#76
Posted 26 March 2013 - 09:40 PM
#77
Posted 26 March 2013 - 10:18 PM
I since got a letter from the DVLA asking if I was the registered keeper. I phoned and explained the situation. They said there was nothing they could do; ownership is not confirmed by a V5 and they do not get into issues of ownership and therefore this new guy was the registered keeper.
This is where you messed up. You should have said that you were the registered keeper and you did not agree to the registered keeper update. Then the guy would not have had a valid V5 and would have been limited with the options he could have done with the car!
#78
Posted 27 March 2013 - 09:02 AM
Well done for finding that and linking it back to this thread

#79
Posted 28 March 2013 - 12:12 PM
I tried to explain the thing to the DVLa but they wouldn't listen. I'm having trouble getting hold of the legal services at the moment as well.
I will keep trying though.
#80
Posted 28 March 2013 - 12:13 PM
#81
Posted 28 March 2013 - 02:46 PM
#82
Posted 28 March 2013 - 06:54 PM
#83
Posted 28 March 2013 - 11:12 PM
#84
Posted 29 March 2013 - 11:07 AM
Appropriation also covers where someone sells your property which looks like is the case.
Problems arise when it comes to the intention of theft. This is all about dishonesty. If the guy selling it knows he shouldn't, he's dishonest and may be liable for theft. If he didnt know then he's not, quite simple. Section 6 covers "intention to permanently deprive" which he quite obviously would be doing but all the boxes have to be ticked.
As for this towing company- they may be guilty of theft under "A later assumption of a right". This sub section basically covers where someone takes your property without stealing it (which they didn't) but then later decide to keep it or sell it.
You may have messed up when you told them they could keep it to be crushed as you consent them to the rights of it. However... Section 5(3) states that if someone aquires property to do a particular thing with it (eg. You gave permission for the car to be crushed, not sold on) and the company do not do that particular thing, they have breached a legal obligation to you.
Again the men's rea (intention) is where it gets tricky. The Act states 3 situations where someone is NOT dishonest. The first one is "he had in law, the right to deprive the other from it, on behalf of himself or a third person". This basically means if you owned him money (for towing costs or storage costs) and he felt that he had the right to sell your car to stop himself making a loss, then he wasn't being dishonest as he genuinely believed he was not breaking the law.
Hope all that helps you get your head around some of the law and where you stand!! Bit of an essay though lol. You got in touch with any legal advisors??
#85
Posted 29 March 2013 - 02:22 PM
and he says he is relisting it - due to timewaster ?
hope you get it back soon
best of luck
#86
Posted 29 March 2013 - 02:58 PM
#87
Posted 29 March 2013 - 06:30 PM
#88
Posted 29 March 2013 - 07:03 PM
Unfortunately, I have not been able to talk to any lawyers yet. I think they are on Easter leave or something in Germany which is really annoying!
#89
Posted 29 March 2013 - 10:14 PM
I think if you were 'watching' the original listing ebay will send you an email to say if it gets relisted
Also there must be a way of getting this guys address?....
........What do you mean set up a false account and 'win' the auction.......
Sorry that would probably be illegal and wrong :) your probably better off just asking to arrange a viewing...
Edited by tractor, 29 March 2013 - 10:20 PM.
#90
Posted 29 March 2013 - 10:28 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users