Edit:
amp -
175 watts RMS x 1 at 4 ohms
250 watts RMS x 1 at 2 ohms
(500 max)
sub - 300watt
Edited by megamini_jb, 01 October 2012 - 05:31 PM.
Posted 01 October 2012 - 05:23 PM
Edited by megamini_jb, 01 October 2012 - 05:31 PM.
Posted 01 October 2012 - 06:25 PM
Edited by Skortchio, 01 October 2012 - 06:25 PM.
Posted 01 October 2012 - 06:39 PM
Most subs, JL Audio and JBL especially can more than comfortably handle excess power. In most cases you're better off over powering than under.
The amp you picked is above the subs minimum input so you'll be fine there, should be a nice combo!
Do you have an enclosure for the sub already or are you planning to make one, it's as important (probably more so) as the sub you use.
If you don't have one and plan to buy then you'll have to account for that in your budget.
Of course, if you can save a little more than the £120 you stated. There is this:
http://www.caraudiod...01-package.html
Ask nicely and they might throw you in a fitting kit for free (£15)
Posted 01 October 2012 - 06:42 PM
Right so doing some research and the JL amp and second sub should be perfect.... yes?
Edit:
amp -
175 watts RMS x 1 at 4 ohms
250 watts RMS x 1 at 2 ohms
(500 max)
sub - 300watt
Posted 01 October 2012 - 06:44 PM
Posted 01 October 2012 - 06:49 PM
Right so doing some research and the JL amp and second sub should be perfect.... yes?
Edit:
amp -
175 watts RMS x 1 at 4 ohms
250 watts RMS x 1 at 2 ohms
(500 max)
sub - 300watt
The bigger jl sub runs at a 2ohm impedance, so that amp will provide 250watts rms. I will say tho having JL sub and amp may look nice buts its not the best option. JL have it nailed in regards to sub because thats what they specialise in and started out with. Amps not so much, personally there are better amps out there than jl for a similar price.
As Skortchio said subs like like to be a little over powered over the RMS and can be over powered by quite a bit. 250 watts will be ok but you wont get the same punch as a 300 watt amp or more.
Again from what ive experienced is this, I originally used a Genesis profile 2 amp which is a two channel amp that I bridged to get more power. This gave me 220watts rms (genesis generally underrate there amps so its could have been more, maybe 230 to 240watts). The sub run OK and gave a nice bass in my sealed enclosure (made to JL specifications), after getting the genesis profile sub which is 350watts rms (monoblock) which gave me a little more than the required rms for my sub its was far, far better, much punchier and generally better bass than before.
So yes that amo will power it at a little less power, it isn't ideal and you wont get the full potential of that sub. I would have a look around to see if you can get a more powerful amp that will provide the 300+ watts rms that you really need. In the long run it be a better route to go down.
Right so doing some research and the JL amp and second sub should be perfect.... yes?
Edit:
amp -
175 watts RMS x 1 at 4 ohms
250 watts RMS x 1 at 2 ohms
(500 max)
sub - 300watt
The bigger jl sub runs at a 2ohm impedance, so that amp will provide 250watts rms. I will say tho having JL sub and amp may look nice buts its not the best option. JL have it nailed in regards to sub because thats what they specialise in and started out with. Amps not so much, personally there are better amps out there than jl for a similar price.
As Skortchio said subs like like to be a little over powered over the RMS and can be over powered by quite a bit. 250 watts will be ok but you wont get the same punch as a 300 watt amp or more.
Again from what ive experienced is this, I originally used a Genesis profile 2 amp which is a two channel amp that I bridged to get more power. This gave me 220watts rms (genesis generally underrate there amps so its could have been more, maybe 230 to 240watts). The sub run OK and gave a nice bass in my sealed enclosure (made to JL specifications), after getting the genesis profile sub which is 350watts rms (monoblock) which gave me a little more than the required rms for my sub its was far, far better, much punchier and generally better bass than before.
So yes that amo will power it at a little less power, it isn't ideal and you wont get the full potential of that sub. I would have a look around to see if you can get a more powerful amp that will provide the 300+ watts rms that you really need. In the long run it be a better route to go down.
Posted 01 October 2012 - 06:58 PM
Posted 01 October 2012 - 06:59 PM
Posted 01 October 2012 - 07:03 PM
Posted 01 October 2012 - 07:04 PM
Posted 01 October 2012 - 07:06 PM
Posted 01 October 2012 - 07:09 PM
What a great analagy!
Unless it's a GT5 then you have a flexible door
Posted 01 October 2012 - 07:18 PM
Posted 01 October 2012 - 07:20 PM
Posted 01 October 2012 - 07:21 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users