Horses don't have to stop; they choose to. Or rather the riders do. There is absolutely no way it is practical for every cyclist to stop every time a car wants to go past.if you are on a narrow road you cannot overtake a single cyclists safely full stop so we ride two abreast to discourage cars from overtaking us dangerously as there isnt the space for them to do so at all
Then why do you not do what horse riders do and stop, move on to the verge and let the motorist pass safely. Do not cause others frustration as this is what causes accidents.
A. Rubbish.
if you are on a narrow road you cannot overtake a single cyclists safely full stop so we ride two abreast to discourage cars from overtaking us dangerously as there isnt the space for them to do so at all
Then why do you not do what horse riders do and stop, move on to the verge and let the motorist pass safely. Do not cause others frustration as this is what causes accidents.
A. a horse isnt going over 10mph cyclists go between 15-20mph on flats and bikes don't get spooked or out of control at times if scared
B. if we had to stop every time a car wanted to overtake we would get about 10 miles away from home.
C. if we were to do this would the motorists pay for the brake pads and new wheelset when they wear through?
D. if the road is very narrow and we have had cars behind for a while we will pull over but we wont stop for every one thats a ridiculous idea.
A. You are still going slower than the average car so you should be courteous and let them passed
B. You do not have a god given right to do as you please on the road, if you are hindered by others then accept it.
C. Then will you pay for the brakes and clutch wear and the extra fuel that drivers use as they have to slow and accelerate for you
D. I think riding cycles on narrow roads is a ridiculous idea, as the cars can legally going in excess of 3 time your quoted cycle speed.
B. Exactly, so cars shouldn't try to get past bikes as quickly as they can either, and wait until its safe.
C. Ridiculous comment by both parties.
D. Just because its a speed limit, its not mandatory to do that speed. Which means if you can't see the road ahead, you should be slowing to a speed you can safely or quickly stop. If you can see the hazard, i.e. the cyclist, you should be adjusting your speed. Like you say, everyone has the right to use the road.
Frankly, there are some absolutely ridiculous arguments being put across by car drivers in this thread. You can actually cycle quite far behind a large vehicle such as a bus or lorry and still benefit from the slip stream. Modern bikes can stop very quickly, and if you are off to one side it is extremely unlikely you will crash into the back of the bus.
C. was supposed to be a ridiculous comment to show how petty it could get