
Top Gear India Adventure
#91
Posted 29 December 2011 - 12:54 PM
#92
Posted 29 December 2011 - 01:07 PM
yes India are a wealthy nation, a super power who feature in the G20 (i think). On the other hand a quarter are living below the poverty line. The country lacks infrastructure, local governments seem to be fragmented from the national government, there may also be a hint of corruption at all levels.
Why such a huge divide between so called national wealth and individual poverty is not for us to say. what we can say; is there is a huge divide between the haves and the have nots, you just had to look at the cars which drove up to the "topgear" party in last nights episode to see that.
No one will dispute that there are really poor maybe hungry people in India. My original point was, that the topgear buffoons were insensitive approaching disrespectful, in their action of throwing, spilling and playing with food.
#93
Posted 29 December 2011 - 01:53 PM
#94
Posted 29 December 2011 - 02:07 PM
#95
Posted 29 December 2011 - 02:41 PM
#96
Posted 29 December 2011 - 02:44 PM
Look at films and other programs, some Proper Classic cars were used in programs such as Heartbeat.
A mini of 2000 vintage has classic status and is not a classic car.
Something else to note is most of the topgear cars end up on display not scrapped.
As others have said some people need to lighten up. Enough people are breaking cars for spares in the classifieds section Yet not one of them is being moaned at for doing so.
#97
Posted 29 December 2011 - 03:05 PM
It was rigged to happen that way anyway. Think of the damage it could have caused if the winch was attached to the subframe. This way they could at least stick a new front end on for a couple of hundred quid and be back to the way it was.
#98
Posted 29 December 2011 - 03:26 PM
Look at Africa. With the amount of world aid they have received poverty should not be a problem!
Aside from that and back on track, it was clear the panels were rigged to do that - the a panels were undamaged! It was funny to see.
As for the insensitivity, like has been said, it was for tv, it's not real! Do you think they just failed to deliver all those meals? And I am also sure the production team would have paid for any food they did use! Clarkson might be an oaf, but James May isn't and would not have been that stupid, let alone the production team.
#99
Posted 29 December 2011 - 03:34 PM
I thought Hammond already had a Mini though? He said at the start that this was his first, but I'm sure I've read somewhere (probably a link to the TG website from here?) that he already owns one. I think it was in an article about best cars ever made or something of that sort.
#100
Posted 29 December 2011 - 03:42 PM
As for the insensitivity, like has been said, it was for tv, it's not real! Do you think they just failed to deliver all those meals? And I am also sure the production team would have paid for any food they did use! Clarkson might be an oaf, but James May isn't and would not have been that stupid, let alone the production team.
Brilliant do you think we are concerned that the food didn't get delivered to its intended recipients? And hundreds of workers went without their lunch! Of course it was staged! The insensitivity is that they clearly wasted food in a country where many go without. This was also watched by hundreds of bystanders, who themselves while maybe not hungry, have some respect to the value of food.
#101
Posted 29 December 2011 - 03:59 PM
#102
Posted 29 December 2011 - 04:44 PM
I hate the fact that there is so much poverty in the world. But the TG team is not the issue - the country does ok, it's an internal issue on the distribution of wealth, just like half of Africa. Call me insensitive if you want, but I find it hard to get all emotional about when it's partly their own fault.
Did anyone else think the straight 6 cricket was good?!
#103
Posted 29 December 2011 - 05:01 PM
Yes mate, I thought it was brilliantDid anyone else think the straight 6 cricket was good?!

#104
Posted 29 December 2011 - 05:05 PM
Most of the tins were empty and those that did have something barely looked like food anyway.
You could have a point there!
#105
Posted 29 December 2011 - 05:08 PM
As for the insensitivity, like has been said, it was for tv, it's not real! Do you think they just failed to deliver all those meals? And I am also sure the production team would have paid for any food they did use! Clarkson might be an oaf, but James May isn't and would not have been that stupid, let alone the production team.
Brilliant do you think we are concerned that the food didn't get delivered to its intended recipients? And hundreds of workers went without their lunch! Of course it was staged! The insensitivity is that they clearly wasted food in a country where many go without. This was also watched by hundreds of bystanders, who themselves while maybe not hungry, have some respect to the value of food.
Get a life mate, food gets wasted everywhere, I am fed up with ******* going on about how others should feel or behave as if they are on a higher moral plain and need to advertise that fact.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users