There will never be a consensus of opinion as to what constitutes a 'genuine' car.
There are not many of us still in the Mini game who were around doing things with Minis back in the 1960's. Sadly I was
.
Many of the successful race & rally cars were built up from a new or even a used, crashed, written off and bought back body-shell. They were accepted as genuine cars at the time and, indeed, much pro-Mini publicity was generated from their results. Even the Britax race and other championship winning cars were built up from parts. Were they not Cooper 'S's?
So many ordinary Cooper 'S's had to be re-shelled due to damage and/or rust, whilst others were converted by capable owners to full Cooper 'S' specification.
To me, if a car has a Cooper 'S' V5 and the car is, in every respect to a full-on Cooper 'S' specification & configuration, then it is a Cooper 'S'. What else can it be?
If there were some differences in the body-shell between a Mk.1 850 & a MK.1 'S' it might be different, but they are identical with only the gear-lever hole cut differently on the 997, 998 and 'S' variants. It's just a hole in the floor for goodness sake. What if an original Cooper 'S' shell had been used to re-shell a 998 Cooper or an 850. Would the same 'it's a fake' attitude be applied?
Everyone goes on about the successes of the Mini in competition. The 4-lights spotlights on the later cars echo this heritage, but then as soon as the fact that virtually all the cars which created this aura were re-shelled, often into used 850 shells, these cars are deemed 'non-genuine'.
There is a great difference between re-shelling a genuine, but very rusty and damaged, Cooper 'S' into a re-built Mk.1 (or Mk.2 shell if appropriate) and 'ringing' an early car into a later car with lots of 'dodgy' parts then trying to pass it of as 'original.
We all need to keep an open mind and to be careful if buying a car for a lot of money. Just be sure you know what you are buying.
'.
Edited by Cooperman, 15 February 2017 - 03:52 PM.